Re: [Live-devel] Implicit RTSP session timeout

2007-08-04 Thread Ross Finlayson
>On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 02:58:37AM -0700, Ross Finlayson wrote: >> However, I don't think a client could really do much that is useful >> should it see this parameter. Client 'liveness' is indicated by RTCP >> "RR" packets, which the client sends frequently already. >> >> In other words, I do

Re: [Live-devel] Implicit RTSP session timeout

2007-08-04 Thread Juha Ylipekkala
Hi again, On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 02:58:37AM -0700, Ross Finlayson wrote: > However, I don't think a client could really do much that is useful > should it see this parameter. Client 'liveness' is indicated by RTCP > "RR" packets, which the client sends frequently already. > > In other words,

Re: [Live-devel] Implicit RTSP session timeout

2007-08-04 Thread Ross Finlayson
The timeout interval (i.e., how long the server waits before timing out a session due to client inactivity) is something that is determined by the *server*, not by the client. The default timeout is 45 seconds; however, you can change this (in the "reclamationTestSeconds" parameter to "RTSPSer

[Live-devel] Implicit RTSP session timeout

2007-08-04 Thread Juha Ylipekkala
Hello everyone, I spotted a small problem with timeouts using live555 and vlc: when an RTSP server does not give an explicit timeout for the session, live555 RTSP client does not use the implicit 60 second timeout specified in the RFC. Would things break seriously if you changed the constructor of

Re: [Live-devel] Two Concerns

2007-08-04 Thread Ross Finlayson
I couldn't follow all of this (especially the bizarre final question), but one thing you should note - that may be relevant - is that, in our current RTSP server implementation, each "PLAY", "PAUSE" and/or "TEARDOWN" command must use the same TCP connection as the original "SETUP" command. (Th