To clarify, H<>C TLS is fairly non-intrusive from protocol point of view
as far as simply supporting the nmdcs URI is all it is in terms of how
it exists currently if memory serves.
The C<>C TLS as it is implemented by DC++ derivatives and some other
clients, on the other hand, is reliant on some
@Delion: One problem that point @Crise by his comment is that even if
"ApexDC++ seems to work just fine [...] DC++not", like NMDCs is not
written in specification -> "whether DC++ or any other client chooses to
implement that or some other variant of TLS for NMDC is up to every
project individually
P.S. I'm not a big fun of NMDCs too, just curious.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Dcplusplus-team, which is subscribed to DC++.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/841189
Title:
Encryption under NMDC
Status in DC++:
New
Bug description:
Well it seems like a
Crise, ApexDC++ seems to work just fine with NMDCs.
DC++ not.
So we wanna know if it is intentionally or not.
** Attachment added: "nmdcs.png"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/dcplusplus/+bug/841189/+attachment/5261934/+files/nmdcs.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
DCNF does indeed support NMDC, if that is the word you would like to
use. However, the primary role for DCNF in regards to NMDC at the moment
is just that of retaining information for all intents and purposes.
As far as I am aware there are no plans to actively develop NMDC
further, in any capacit
@Crise: Sadly it's not a release fix.
Like you may know, NMDC is still supported by DCNF.
Maybe by stopping this support, it'll give a big signal to others?
Or if we continue to support it, then this is still an issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Dcplusplus
There is already a released fix for this issue... it is called ADC(S).
NMDC already has way too many ADC features backported to it already, at
some point people will just have to choose to move on [to ADC,
hopefully] or simply live with its current deficits.
--
You received this bug notification
Hello
Now we are in 2019
This issue, that have been tagged as "Importance: wishlist" in 2013, should
have been tagged as "Importance: very important" now.
Encryption is really important in a world where all want information
about you for nothing.
** Tags added: security
** Tags added: encrypt
** Changed in: dcplusplus
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Dcplusplus-team, which is subscribed to DC++.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/841189
Title:
Encryption under NMDC
Status in DC++:
New
Bug description:
Well it
9 matches
Mail list logo
