[Linuxdcpp-team] [Bug 804559] Re: portable semaphore implementation

Fair enough, I've reverted the code in DC++ (hopefully didn't break the repository). ** Changed in: dcplusplus Status: Fix Committed => In Progress ** Changed in: dcplusplus Status: In Progress => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Dcpluspl

[Linuxdcpp-team] [Bug 804559] Re: portable semaphore implementation

the patch submitted by Gennady has not been applied in the version of boost currently in the DC++ repo. at a first glance at the file in question, this might affect Windows builds (Windows-specific stuff is within an elif-guar

[Linuxdcpp-team] [Bug 804559] Re: portable semaphore implementation

** Changed in: dcplusplus Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Dcplusplus-team, which is subscribed to DC++. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/804559 Title: portable semaphore implementation Status in AirDC++: Confirmed

[Linuxdcpp-team] [Bug 804559] Re: portable semaphore implementation

As far as I can tell, this is fixed in newer version of Boost (that we are using). I propose we finally apply this patch (included is a diff against the current code base). ** Patch added: "dcpp_semaphore.diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/dcplusplus/+bug/804559/+attachment/4489241/+files/dcpp_s

[Linuxdcpp-team] [Bug 804559] Re: portable semaphore implementation

** Also affects: airdcpp Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: airdcpp Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: airdcpp Importance: Undecided => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Dcplusplus-team, which is subscribed to DC++. http

[Linuxdcpp-team] [Bug 804559] Re: portable semaphore implementation

** Tags added: core -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Dcplusplus-team, which is subscribed to DC++. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/804559 Title: portable semaphore implementation Status in DC++: Confirmed Status in StrongDC++: Confirmed Bug description:

[Linuxdcpp-team] [Bug 804559] Re: portable semaphore implementation

Thanks for your information. I also suggest dropping Semaphore class completely and use boost semaphore directly (of course, when the bug is fixed). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Dcplusplus-team, which is subscribed to DC++. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/8045

[Linuxdcpp-team] [Bug 804559] Re: portable semaphore implementation

btw, boost1.47 has issues with interprocess_semaphore see boost bug https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/4524 I think my patch should not be merged until boost bug 4524 is resolved I keep an eye on bug 4524 and will drop a note here ** Bug watch added: Boost Trac #4524 http://svn.boost.org

[Linuxdcpp-team] [Bug 804559] Re: portable semaphore implementation

** Also affects: strongdc Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: strongdc Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Dcplusplus-team, which is subscribed to DC++. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/804559 Title: portable

[Linuxdcpp-team] [Bug 804559] Re: portable semaphore implementation

** Changed in: dcplusplus Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: dcplusplus Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: dcplusplus Assignee: (unassigned) => Jacek Sieka (arnetheduck) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Dcplusplus-team, which is subs

[Linuxdcpp-team] [Bug 804559] Re: portable semaphore implementation

** Patch added: "sem.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/804559/+attachment/2187219/+files/sem.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Dcplusplus-team, which is subscribed to DC++. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/804559 Title: portable semaphore implementa