[Linuxdcpp-team] [Bug 602845] Re: Request for Limits

2011-02-27 Thread Pirre
** Changed in: adchpp Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Dcplusplus-team, which is a bug assignee. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/602845 Title: Request for Limits Status in ADCH++: Fix Released Bug description:

[Linuxdcpp-team] [Bug 602845] Re: Request for Limits

2010-12-26 Thread Toast
** Changed in: adchpp Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: adchpp Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Dcplusplus-team, which is a bug assignee. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/602845 Title: Request for

[Linuxdcpp-team] [Bug 602845] Re: Request for Limits

2010-10-24 Thread DjSlash
At first I was under the impression that ADCH++ was feature-rich and mature. But now I found this request/bug and after investigating the source code a bit further, I'm not so sure if I want to use it for my main hub. The hub software I currently use isn't developed anymore, but has at least a bunc

[Linuxdcpp-team] [Bug 602845] Re: Request for Limits

2010-10-21 Thread Spookie
Can only agree here also. Minshare, min/max hubs, slots should been supported by the hubsoft. -- Request for Limits https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/602845 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Dcplusplus-team, which is a bug assignee. Status in ADCH++: Confirmed Bug des

[Linuxdcpp-team] [Bug 602845] Re: Request for Limits

2010-10-21 Thread iceman50
I'd have to agree, minimalistic functions such as min share, min/max hubs and slots should always be supported by the hub software, saying you need to use the ptokax bridge is just crippling ADCH, if that's the case then shouldn't ptokax bridge just be another module of ADCH and not a standalone...

[Linuxdcpp-team] [Bug 602845] Re: Request for Limits

2010-07-18 Thread Toast
Also limitations on cfg commands and other sensitive commands so that only persons with x amount of level can access and change values -- Request for Limits https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/602845 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Dcplusplus-team, which is a bug assign

[Linuxdcpp-team] [Bug 602845] Re: Request for Limits

2010-07-16 Thread Toast
** Changed in: adchpp Status: Opinion => Confirmed -- Request for Limits https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/602845 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Dcplusplus-team, which is a bug assignee. Status in ADCH++: Confirmed Bug description: Requesting following limit