[Linuxdcpp-team] [Bug 497129] Re: timestamps in lxde ?

2009-12-15 Thread lys
ahh doh!! , that fixed that, thanks. -- timestamps in lxde ? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497129 You received this bug notification because you are a member of LinuxDC++ Team, which is subscribed to LinuxDC++. Status in Linux DC++: Invalid Bug description: can anyone please explain why i get

[Linuxdcpp-team] [Bug 497129] Re: timestamps in lxde ?

2009-12-15 Thread Razzloss
Because you've configured it to use that format. You'll most likely want %H:%M:%S as a time stamp format. %s is seconds since epoch, which really isn't that useful when formatted like that. --RZ ** Changed in: linuxdcpp Status: New => Invalid ** Converted to question: https://answers.l

Re: [Linuxdcpp-team] [Question #94207]: timestamps in lxde ?

2009-12-15 Thread Razzloss
Question #94207 on LinuxDC++ changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/linuxdcpp/+question/94207 Razzloss posted a new comment: Because you've configured it to use that format. You'll most likely want %H:%M:%S as a time stamp format. %s is seconds since epoch, which really isn't that useful when form

[Linuxdcpp-team] [Question #94207]: timestamps in lxde ?

2009-12-15 Thread Razzloss
New question #94207 on LinuxDC++: https://answers.launchpad.net/linuxdcpp/+question/94207 can anyone please explain why i get this strange format with 1.03+bzr linuxdc? [20:57:1260910647] <ÞèÑgÜïÑ> VerliHub-0.9.9a (Monday Oct 26 2009) [20:57:1260910647] <ÞèÑgÜïÑ> RunTime: 1weeks 2days [20:57:126

[Linuxdcpp-team] [Bug 497129] [NEW] timestamps in lxde ?

2009-12-15 Thread lys
Public bug reported: can anyone please explain why i get this strange format with 1.03+bzr linuxdc? [20:57:1260910647] <ÞèÑgÜïÑ> VerliHub-0.9.9a (Monday Oct 26 2009) [20:57:1260910647] <ÞèÑgÜïÑ> RunTime: 1weeks 2days [20:57:1260910647] <ÞèÑgÜïÑ> User Count: 38 [20:57:1260910647] <ÞèÑgÜïÑ> System