On Wed, Jul 17, 2024, at 07:08, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 at 21:57, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
>
> ./arch/arm64/include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd_64.h
> ./arch/arm64/include/generated/asm/syscall_table_32.h
> ./arch/arm64/include/generated/asm/syscall_table_64.h
> ./arch/ar
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024, at 08:41, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 08:01:43AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024, at 07:08, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> > On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 at 21:57, Linus Torvalds
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Note, it really might be just 'allmodconfig'. We'
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 10:01:10AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024, at 08:41, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > FWIW, I noticed this last Friday as well when I did a few builds of
> > linux-next and every change I made triggered what appeared to be a full
> > rebuild of the tree.
> >
> >
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024, at 10:17, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 10:01:10AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> Yeah, that's not something I noticed at least (and I assume I would
> have). And I only did aarch64 builds on a 6.9 x86_64 host (make 4.4.1).
Ok, I can reproduce the problem now
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024, at 11:36, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024, at 10:17, Johan Hovold wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 10:01:10AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, that's not something I noticed at least (and I assume I would
>> have). And I only did aarch64 builds on a 6.9 x86
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024, at 12:54, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> -$(obj)/syscall_table_%.h: $(syscalltbl) $(systbl) FORCE
> +$(obj)/syscall_table_%.h: $(syscalltbl) $(systbl)
> $(call if_changed,systbl)
>
> # Create output directory. Skip it if at least one old header exists
>
> Masahiro, does t
