Re: [PATCH] kbuild: use ?= to assign CROSS_COMPILE by arch-Makefile

Hi Yamada-san, On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 3:56 PM Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Use ?= operator to let arch/*/Makefile to assign CROSS_COMPILE only > when CROSS_COMPILE is undefined. > > This allows arch-Makefiles to drop the ifeq ($(CROSS_COMPILE),) > conditional. > > This slightly changes the behavior;

Re: [PATCH] kbuild: use ?= to assign CROSS_COMPILE by arch-Makefile

On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 4:44 PM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Hi Yamada-san, > > On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 3:56 PM Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > Use ?= operator to let arch/*/Makefile to assign CROSS_COMPILE only > > when CROSS_COMPILE is undefined. > > > > This allows arch-Makefiles to drop the ifeq

Re: [PATCH] kbuild: use ?= to assign CROSS_COMPILE by arch-Makefile

On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 5:15 PM Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 4:44 PM Geert Uytterhoeven > wrote: > > > > Hi Yamada-san, > > > > On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 3:56 PM Masahiro Yamada > > wrote: > > > Use ?= operator to let arch/*/Makefile to assign CROSS_COMPILE only > > > when

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.11 10/51] arc: kernel: Return -EFAULT if copy_to_user() fails

From: Wang Qing [ Upstream commit 46e152186cd89d940b26726fff11eb3f4935b45a ] The copy_to_user() function returns the number of bytes remaining to be copied, but we want to return -EFAULT if the copy doesn't complete. Signed-off-by: Wang Qing Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta Signed-off-by: Sasha Le

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 09/46] arc: kernel: Return -EFAULT if copy_to_user() fails

From: Wang Qing [ Upstream commit 46e152186cd89d940b26726fff11eb3f4935b45a ] The copy_to_user() function returns the number of bytes remaining to be copied, but we want to return -EFAULT if the copy doesn't complete. Signed-off-by: Wang Qing Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta Signed-off-by: Sasha Le

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 09/39] arc: kernel: Return -EFAULT if copy_to_user() fails

From: Wang Qing [ Upstream commit 46e152186cd89d940b26726fff11eb3f4935b45a ] The copy_to_user() function returns the number of bytes remaining to be copied, but we want to return -EFAULT if the copy doesn't complete. Signed-off-by: Wang Qing Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta Signed-off-by: Sasha Le

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 05/28] arc: kernel: Return -EFAULT if copy_to_user() fails

From: Wang Qing [ Upstream commit 46e152186cd89d940b26726fff11eb3f4935b45a ] The copy_to_user() function returns the number of bytes remaining to be copied, but we want to return -EFAULT if the copy doesn't complete. Signed-off-by: Wang Qing Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta Signed-off-by: Sasha Le

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 03/25] arc: kernel: Return -EFAULT if copy_to_user() fails

From: Wang Qing [ Upstream commit 46e152186cd89d940b26726fff11eb3f4935b45a ] The copy_to_user() function returns the number of bytes remaining to be copied, but we want to return -EFAULT if the copy doesn't complete. Signed-off-by: Wang Qing Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta Signed-off-by: Sasha Le

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 03/23] arc: kernel: Return -EFAULT if copy_to_user() fails

From: Wang Qing [ Upstream commit 46e152186cd89d940b26726fff11eb3f4935b45a ] The copy_to_user() function returns the number of bytes remaining to be copied, but we want to return -EFAULT if the copy doesn't complete. Signed-off-by: Wang Qing Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta Signed-off-by: Sasha Le

[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.4 03/23] arc: kernel: Return -EFAULT if copy_to_user() fails

From: Wang Qing [ Upstream commit 46e152186cd89d940b26726fff11eb3f4935b45a ] The copy_to_user() function returns the number of bytes remaining to be copied, but we want to return -EFAULT if the copy doesn't complete. Signed-off-by: Wang Qing Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta Signed-off-by: Sasha Le

Re: *** ARC port for review ***

Hi Richard, Thanks for your quick reply. For the time, ARCv3 is an under development architecture and unfortunately, for the time being, there is no public documentation available. Please notice that this should be all available once ARCv3 gets released. QEMU ARCv3 port is really an early stag

Re: [PATCH 07/27] arc: TCG instruction definitions

Hi Richard, I totally understand your position with a new scripting language and the unclean code produced by the auto generated tools. In order to ease out the review process, I propose to drop the idea of the generated code and cleanup by hand all of the semfunc.c functions. What is you opinio