Zebu boards were added in v4.9 and then renamed to "haps" in v4.10.
Thus backporting
commit 64234961c145 (ARC: configs: Remove CONFIG_INITRAMFS_SOURCE from
defconfigs)
we missed "zebu" defconfigs in v4.9.
Note this is only applicable to "linux-4.9.y"!
Spotted by KerneCI, see [1].
[1]
https://
Hi Kevin,
On Sat, 2018-12-08 at 13:58 -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> FYI... we now have stable trees building all the ARCv2 defconfigs in
> kernelCI.org, and there are couple build failures. Following the link
> below, you'll be able to see full build logs.
Thanks you so much for letting us know.
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:33:49AM +0300, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> Zebu boards were added in v4.9 and then renamed to "haps" in v4.10.
>
> Thus backporting
> commit 64234961c145 (ARC: configs: Remove CONFIG_INITRAMFS_SOURCE from
> defconfigs)
> we missed "zebu" defconfigs in v4.9.
>
> Note this i
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
ARC: [zebu] Remove CONFIG_INITRAMFS_SOURCE from defconfigs
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 1:01 AM Alexey Brodkin
wrote:
>
> Done automatically with help of:
> --->8
> sed -i 's/@0x/@/g' arch/arc/boot/dts/*.dts*
> --->8
>
> Inspired by [1] and the like.
>
> [1] http://kisskb.el
Hi Rob,
On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 07:30 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 1:01 AM Alexey Brodkin
> wrote:
> > Done automatically with help of:
> > --->8
> > sed -i 's/@0x/@/g' arch/arc/boot/dts/*.dts*
> > --->8--
Hi Doug,
On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 10:40:24AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 9:42 AM Catalin Marinas
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 07:38:24PM -0800, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > > Douglas Anderson (4):
> > > kgdb: Remove irq flags from roundup
> > > kgdb: Fix kgdb_r
Dave, can you pick the series up through the sparc tree? I could also
merge it through the dma-mapping tree, but given that there is no
dependency on it the sparc tree seem like the better fit.
___
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infrad
From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:32:56 +0100
> Dave, can you pick the series up through the sparc tree? I could also
> merge it through the dma-mapping tree, but given that there is no
> dependency on it the sparc tree seem like the better fit.
I thought that some of this is a
On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 07:52:04PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > #ifdef CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG
> > @@ -773,7 +791,7 @@ static void *__dma_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t
> > size, dma_addr_t *handle,
> >
> > if (cma)
> > buf->allocator = &cma_allocator;
> > - else if (is_co
On 08/12/2018 17:36, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
There is no need to have an additional kernel mapping for a contiguous
allocation if the device already is DMA coherent, so skip it.
FWIW, the "need" was that it kept the code in this path simple and the
mapping behaviour consistent with the regula
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 10:10:39AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Christoph Hellwig
> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:32:56 +0100
>
> > Dave, can you pick the series up through the sparc tree? I could also
> > merge it through the dma-mapping tree, but given that there is no
> > dependency on it t
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 07:19:30PM +, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 08/12/2018 17:36, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> There is no need to have an additional kernel mapping for a contiguous
>> allocation if the device already is DMA coherent, so skip it.
>
> FWIW, the "need" was that it kept the code in
From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 20:22:28 +0100
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 10:10:39AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Christoph Hellwig
>> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:32:56 +0100
>>
>> > Dave, can you pick the series up through the sparc tree? I could also
>> > merge it through
14 matches
Mail list logo
