On Mon 26-03-18 22:45:31, Ilya Smith wrote:
>
> > On 26 Mar 2018, at 11:46, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >
> > On Fri 23-03-18 20:55:49, Ilya Smith wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 23 Mar 2018, at 15:48, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 07:36:36PM +0300, Ilya Smith wrote:
> Current
> On 27 Mar 2018, at 10:24, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> On Mon 26-03-18 22:45:31, Ilya Smith wrote:
>>
>>> On 26 Mar 2018, at 11:46, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri 23-03-18 20:55:49, Ilya Smith wrote:
> On 23 Mar 2018, at 15:48, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 20
On Tue 27-03-18 16:51:08, Ilya Smith wrote:
>
> > On 27 Mar 2018, at 10:24, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >
> > On Mon 26-03-18 22:45:31, Ilya Smith wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 26 Mar 2018, at 11:46, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Fri 23-03-18 20:55:49, Ilya Smith wrote:
>
> > On 23 Mar 2018,
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Evgeniy Didin
commit 47b7de2f6c18f75d1f2716efe752cba43f32a626 upstream.
It was found that in IDMAC mode after soft-reset driver switches
to PIO mode.
That's what happens in case of DTO timeout
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Evgeniy Didin
commit 47b7de2f6c18f75d1f2716efe752cba43f32a626 upstream.
It was found that in IDMAC mode after soft-reset driver switches
to PIO mode.
That's what happens in case of DTO timeout
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Evgeniy Didin
commit 47b7de2f6c18f75d1f2716efe752cba43f32a626 upstream.
It was found that in IDMAC mode after soft-reset driver switches
to PIO mode.
That's what happens in case of DTO timeou
4.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Evgeniy Didin
commit 47b7de2f6c18f75d1f2716efe752cba43f32a626 upstream.
It was found that in IDMAC mode after soft-reset driver switches
to PIO mode.
That's what happens in case of DTO timeou
Hello,
After commit 57bf5a8963f8 ("dma-mapping: clear harmful GFP_* flags in common
code") we noticed problems with Ethernet controller on one of our platforms
(namely ARC HSDK).
I
n particular we see that removal of __GFP_ZERO flag in function
dma_alloc_attrs() was the culprit because in our
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 8:12 PM, Evgeniy Didin
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> After commit 57bf5a8963f8 ("dma-mapping: clear harmful GFP_* flags in common
> code") we noticed problems with Ethernet controller on one of our platforms
> (namely ARC HSDK).
> I
> n particular we see that removal of __GFP_ZER
Hi Christoph, Andy
On 03/27/2018 11:11 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 8:12 PM, Evgeniy Didin
wrote:
Hello,
After commit 57bf5a8963f8 ("dma-mapping: clear harmful GFP_* flags in common
code") we noticed problems with Ethernet controller on one of our platforms (namely
A
Hi Andy,
On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 21:11 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 8:12 PM, Evgeniy Didin
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > After commit 57bf5a8963f8 ("dma-mapping: clear harmful GFP_* flags in
> > common code") we noticed problems with Ethernet controller on one of our
>
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 6:51 AM, Ilya Smith wrote:
>
>> On 27 Mar 2018, at 10:24, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>
>> On Mon 26-03-18 22:45:31, Ilya Smith wrote:
>>>
On 26 Mar 2018, at 11:46, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Fri 23-03-18 20:55:49, Ilya Smith wrote:
>
>> On 23 Mar 2018, at 15:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 03:53:53PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> I agree: pushing this off to libc leaves a lot of things unprotected.
> I think this should live in the kernel. The question I have is about
> making it maintainable/readable/etc.
>
> The state-of-the-art for ASLR is moving to finer gran
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 4:49 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 03:53:53PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> I agree: pushing this off to libc leaves a lot of things unprotected.
>> I think this should live in the kernel. The question I have is about
>> making it maintainable/readable/et
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 06:16:35PM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 04:51:08PM +0300, Ilya Smith wrote:
> > > /dev/[u]random is not sufficient?
> >
> > Using /dev/[u]random makes 3 syscalls - open, read, close. This is a
> > performance
> > issue.
>
> You may want to take
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 04:49:04PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 03:53:53PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > I agree: pushing this off to libc leaves a lot of things unprotected.
> > I think this should live in the kernel. The question I have is about
> > making it maintainable/
On 03/23/2018 02:06 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 02:00:24PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 05:48:06AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 07:36:36PM +0300, Ilya Smith wrote:
Current implementation doesn't randomize address retur
17 matches
Mail list logo