Le 09/01/2017 à 13:56, Christoph Hellwig a écrit :
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 10:43:59AM +0100, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
>> Regularly, when a new header is created in include/uapi/, the developer
>> forgets to add it in the corresponding Kbuild file. This error is usually
>> detected after the release
On Thursday 2017-01-12 16:52, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
>Le 09/01/2017 à 13:56, Christoph Hellwig a écrit :
>> On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 10:43:59AM +0100, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
>>> Regularly, when a new header is created in include/uapi/, the developer
>>> forgets to add it in the corresponding Kbuild
Le 12/01/2017 à 17:28, Jan Engelhardt a écrit :
> On Thursday 2017-01-12 16:52, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
>
>> Le 09/01/2017 à 13:56, Christoph Hellwig a écrit :
>>> On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 10:43:59AM +0100, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
Regularly, when a new header is created in include/uapi/, the dev
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 05:32:09PM +0100, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> What I was trying to say is that I export those directories like other are.
> Removing those files is not related to that series.
Perhaps the correct solution is to only copy files matching "*.h" to
reduce the risk of copying files
> The newer prlimit64 syscall provides all the functionality provided by
> the getrlimit and setrlimit syscalls and adds the pid of target process,
> so future architectures won't need to include getrlimit and setrlimit.
>
> Therefore drop getrlimit and setrlimit syscalls from the generic syscall
>