On Thursday 05 May 2016 04:06 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 May 2016 20:16:19 Horia Geantă wrote:
>> @@ -625,6 +645,16 @@ static inline u32 ioread32be(const volatile void
>> __iomem *addr)
>> }
>> #endif
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
>> +#ifndef ioread64be
>> +#define ioread64be iore
On Thursday 05 May 2016 08:16:47 Vineet Gupta wrote:
> Thx for noticing this Arnd and the heads up. Does the patch below look ok to
> you ?
>
> --->
> rom b7e719831c389ab4fa338b2e2e7c0d1ff90dabb0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Vineet Gupta
> Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 13:32:34 +0530
> Subje
On Thursday 05 May 2016 04:26 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 05 May 2016 08:16:47 Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> > Thx for noticing this Arnd and the heads up. Does the patch below look ok
>> > to you ?
>> >
>> > --->
>> > rom b7e719831c389ab4fa338b2e2e7c0d1ff90dabb0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2
On Tuesday 26 April 2016 06:12 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On Friday 22 April 2016 06:56 PM, Lada Trimasova wrote:
>> I have a question about user-space perf handling error numbers.
>> The problem is that PMU interrupts are not supported in arc700
>> architecture and it is impossible to evaluate `per
