Hi Waldemar,
On Wed, 2016-08-10 at 19:03 +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> Hi,
> Vineet Gupta wrote,
>
> >
> > On 08/08/2016 02:44 PM, Petri Gynther wrote:
> > >
> > > uclibc-ng & ARC developers:
> > >
> > > I'm trying to use buildroot to build the latest ARC toolchain
> > > (arc-2016.09-eng00
On 08/10/2016 10:03 AM, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
>>> 2) Is uclibc-ng 1.0.17 supposed to be compatible with 2.6.x kernel headers?
>> >
>> > No - modern/upstream uClibc-ng is not compatible with 2.6.35
>> > You need to use the uClibc of the time - with pairing gcc/binutils -
>> > although that
>> >
Hi,
Vineet Gupta wrote,
> On 08/08/2016 02:44 PM, Petri Gynther wrote:
> > uclibc-ng & ARC developers:
> >
> > I'm trying to use buildroot to build the latest ARC toolchain
> > (arc-2016.09-eng007) against our vendor-provided 2.6.35.12 ARC Linux
> > kernel. (Yes, it is an ancient kernel, but that'
On 08/08/2016 02:44 PM, Petri Gynther wrote:
> uclibc-ng & ARC developers:
>
> I'm trying to use buildroot to build the latest ARC toolchain
> (arc-2016.09-eng007) against our vendor-provided 2.6.35.12 ARC Linux
> kernel. (Yes, it is an ancient kernel, but that's what I have to work
> with for now,
