Hi,
On 08/22/2018 11:40 AM, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
>
>> Reading kernel/dma/* I see what you mean. We check @ioc_enable at the time of
>> registering the dma op for coherent vs. non coherent case, so there's common
>> vs.
>> ARC versions of alloc/free for coherent vs. noncoherent.
> Just to be sur
Btw, given that I assume this is 4.20 material now, any chance we
could merge it through the dma-mapping tree? I have some major changes
pending that would clash if done in a different tree, so I'd rather
get it all together.
> We check this flag in arch_dma_alloc (which are used in non-coherent
Hi Vineet,
On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 15:34 -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 08/13/2018 10:08 AM, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> > On Mon, 2018-08-13 at 16:24 +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> > > On 07/30/2018 09:26 AM, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> > > > @@ -1263,11 +1254,7 @@ void __init arc_cache_init_master(void)
On 08/13/2018 10:08 AM, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-08-13 at 16:24 +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> On 07/30/2018 09:26 AM, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
>>> @@ -1263,11 +1254,7 @@ void __init arc_cache_init_master(void)
>>> if (is_isa_arcv2() && ioc_enable)
>>> arc_ioc_setup();
>>>
On Mon, 2018-08-13 at 16:24 +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 07/30/2018 09:26 AM, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> > @@ -1263,11 +1254,7 @@ void __init arc_cache_init_master(void)
> > if (is_isa_arcv2() && ioc_enable)
> > arc_ioc_setup();
> >
> > - if (is_isa_arcv2() && ioc_enable) {
> >
On 07/30/2018 09:26 AM, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> @@ -1263,11 +1254,7 @@ void __init arc_cache_init_master(void)
> if (is_isa_arcv2() && ioc_enable)
> arc_ioc_setup();
>
> - if (is_isa_arcv2() && ioc_enable) {
> - __dma_cache_wback_inv = __dma_cache_wback_inv_io
