On 6/15/20 12:53 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
>> This analysis looks good me, although I can't voucher for Joseph.
> This patch is OK.
Pushed. Thx !
-Vineet
___
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman
On Mon, 15 Jun 2020, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> >> Is this sufficient for comparison ?
> >
> > ping !
> >
>
> This analysis looks good me, although I can't voucher for Joseph.
This patch is OK.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
___
linux
On 15/06/2020 16:09, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote:
> On 6/4/20 12:08 PM, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote:
>> On 6/2/20 1:31 PM, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote:
>>> On 6/2/20 11:16 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jun 2020, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote:
> Also as sug
On 6/4/20 12:08 PM, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote:
> On 6/2/20 1:31 PM, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote:
>> On 6/2/20 11:16 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
>>> On Mon, 1 Jun 2020, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote:
>>>
Also as suggested by Joseph [1] used --strip and compared the libs with
On 6/2/20 1:31 PM, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote:
> On 6/2/20 11:16 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
>> On Mon, 1 Jun 2020, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote:
>>
>>> Also as suggested by Joseph [1] used --strip and compared the libs with
>>> and w/o patch and their sizes are exactly same (with gcc 9).
>
On 6/2/20 11:16 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Jun 2020, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote:
>
>> Also as suggested by Joseph [1] used --strip and compared the libs with
>> and w/o patch and their sizes are exactly same (with gcc 9).
>
> My suggestion was to compare the *contents* of the libr
On Mon, 1 Jun 2020, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote:
> Also as suggested by Joseph [1] used --strip and compared the libs with
> and w/o patch and their sizes are exactly same (with gcc 9).
My suggestion was to compare the *contents* of the libraries, not just
their sizes. Either they should
