On 3/11/20 3:56 PM, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote:
>>> Did you run a full
>>> "make check" at least once, to build the initial testroot? It does a
>>> full "make install" into $build/testroot.pristine/ to use as the basis
>>> for the container's root.
>> I definitely did not do that - let me
On 3/11/20 3:38 PM, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote:
> On 3/11/20 3:28 PM, DJ Delorie via Libc-alpha wrote:
>> Vineet Gupta writes:
$ make test-wrapper='>>> to>/br/build/glibc-867196a7635/scripts/cross-test-ssh.sh
root@192.168.0.20' xcheck
subdirs=elf
>>>
>>> FWIW the original fa
On 3/11/20 3:28 PM, DJ Delorie via Libc-alpha wrote:
> Vineet Gupta writes:
>>> $ make test-wrapper='>> to>/br/build/glibc-867196a7635/scripts/cross-test-ssh.sh root@192.168.0.20'
>>> xcheck
>>> subdirs=elf
>>
>> FWIW the original failures were here
>>
>> lock_fd = open (concat (pristine_root_p
Vineet Gupta writes:
>> $ make test-wrapper='> to>/br/build/glibc-867196a7635/scripts/cross-test-ssh.sh root@192.168.0.20'
>> xcheck
>> subdirs=elf
>
> FWIW the original failures were here
>
> lock_fd = open (concat (pristine_root_path, "/lock.fd", NULL),
>O_CREAT | O_TRUNC | O_
Vineet Gupta writes:
> When you say containers is this linux cgroups or something at a higher
> level: does it need any specific distro container package. Please
> remember this is a constrained system built off of buildroot.
It should not require anything beyond what kernel/glibc provides - we
e
On 3/11/20 3:14 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> The containerized tests are (in this case) containerized because they
>> rely on setup files (like /etc/ld.so.conf) inside the container to run
>> the test. Otherwise you end up corrupting the host OS.
>>
>> The test infrastructure knows how to run contai
On 3/11/20 3:07 PM, DJ Delorie via Libc-alpha wrote:
> Vineet Gupta writes:
>> No, I'm running this is a cross-compiled setup where the test artifacts are
>> on a
>> NFS mounted host. Here's the full strace for test
>>
>>
>> $ strace_static -f
>> ~/br/build/glibc-867196a7635/build/elf/tst-ldconfi
Vineet Gupta writes:
> No, I'm running this is a cross-compiled setup where the test artifacts are
> on a
> NFS mounted host. Here's the full strace for test
>
>
> $ strace_static -f
> ~/br/build/glibc-867196a7635/build/elf/tst-ldconfig-ld_so_conf-update
This is a manual run. Even with a cross
On 3/11/20 2:36 PM, DJ Delorie via Libc-alpha wrote:
> Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha writes:
>> The issue is expected src-path for dso.
>>
>> | [pid 168] renameat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/lib/tst-ldconfig-ld-mod.so", AT_FDCWD,
>> | "/tmp/tst-ldconfig/libldconfig-ld-mod.so") = -1 EXDEV
>> | (Invali
Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha writes:
> The issue is expected src-path for dso.
>
> | [pid 168] renameat(AT_FDCWD, "/usr/lib/tst-ldconfig-ld-mod.so", AT_FDCWD,
> | "/tmp/tst-ldconfig/libldconfig-ld-mod.so") = -1 EXDEV
> | (Invalid cross-device link)
>
> In cross setup, /usr/lib needs to b
Hi,
The following tests fail invariably on ARC cross testing setup
FAIL: elf/tst-dlopen-self-container
FAIL: elf/tst-dlopen-tlsmodid-container
FAIL: elf/tst-ldconfig-bad-aux-cache
FAIL: elf/tst-ldconfig-ld_so_conf-update
FAIL: elf/tst-pldd
This is despite having ldconfig on target.
The issue is
11 matches
Mail list logo
