On 10/19/2015 02:35 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 09:28:43AM +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> On Monday 19 October 2015 11:20 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>>> Vineet Gupta writes:
But this user space - so IMHO UP/SMP doesn't matter and we can't simulate
them in
C just b
On Friday 05 February 2016 09:40 PM, a...@redhat.com wrote:
> Em Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 11:18:52AM +, Noam Camus escreveu:
>> Well here for EZchip I also see the:
>> undefined reference to `__sync_add_and_fetch_4'
>> undefined reference to `__sync_sub_and_fetch_4'
>
> Yeah, because there is no:
Em Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 11:18:52AM +, Noam Camus escreveu:
> Well here for EZchip I also see the:
> undefined reference to `__sync_add_and_fetch_4'
> undefined reference to `__sync_sub_and_fetch_4'
Yeah, because there is no: tools/arch/arc/include/asm/atomic.h, can't
you guys adapt arch/arc/in
>From: Vineet Gupta
>Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2016 6:13 AM
>Noam, what's the atomic story for EZChip. Do you support such things for user
space in GNU tools. If -atomic is added to perf user space builds are you guys
OK!
Well here for EZchip I also s
+CC Noam
On Wednesday 03 February 2016 09:50 PM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
>> I agree with the current solution to add -atomic to for arc700 builds.
>> > Although making that default for arc700 tools will be better but that will
>> > not fix
>> > things before next release of tools etc.
>> >
>> > Bu
Hi Vineet,
On Fri, 2015-10-30 at 06:19 +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On Thursday 29 October 2015 09:28 PM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> > Hi Vineet,
> >
> > On Tue, 2015-10-20 at 10:45 +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 20 October 2015 03:41 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > > > Can we use exi
