bject: Re: [RFC] ARC: mm: Restrict definition of pfn_valid() macro for
> CONFIG_FLATMEM
>
> On 11/30/2016 06:21 AM, Yuriy Kolerov wrote:
> >> On Tue 29-11-16 18:29:06, Yuriy Kolerov wrote:
> >>> > > Despite the fact that subtraction of unsigned integers is a
>
On 11/30/2016 06:21 AM, Yuriy Kolerov wrote:
>> On Tue 29-11-16 18:29:06, Yuriy Kolerov wrote:
>>> > > Despite the fact that subtraction of unsigned integers is a defined
>>> > > behaviour however such operations can lead to unexpected results. Thus
>>> > > it is better to check both left and right
ubject: Re: [RFC] ARC: mm: Restrict definition of pfn_valid() macro for
> CONFIG_FLATMEM
>
> On Tue 29-11-16 18:29:06, Yuriy Kolerov wrote:
> > Despite the fact that subtraction of unsigned integers is a defined
> > behaviour however such operations can lead to unexpected re
On Tue 29-11-16 18:29:06, Yuriy Kolerov wrote:
> Despite the fact that subtraction of unsigned integers is a defined
> behaviour however such operations can lead to unexpected results. Thus
> it is better to check both left and right boundaries to avoid potential
> bugs as it done in the generic pa
Despite the fact that subtraction of unsigned integers is a defined
behaviour however such operations can lead to unexpected results. Thus
it is better to check both left and right boundaries to avoid potential
bugs as it done in the generic page.h.
Signed-off-by: Yuriy Kolerov
---
arch/arc/incl
