On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Eugeniy Paltsev
wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 15:36 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 12:22 +, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2016-11-07 at 15:55 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> > > > @@ -52,6 +55,7 @@ struct dw_dma_platform_data {
On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 15:36 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 12:22 +, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2016-11-07 at 15:55 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > + * @only_quirks_used: Only read quirks (like "is_private" or
> > > > "is_memcpy"
On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 12:22 +, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-11-07 at 15:55 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > + * @only_quirks_used: Only read quirks (like "is_private" or
> > > "is_memcpy") from
> > > + * platform data structure. Read other parameters from
> > > device
> > >
On Mon, 2016-11-07 at 15:55 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> Thanks for an update, but, please, answer to all my comments to your
> patch v2. Either you are okay with them, then you didn't address few,
> or
> you are not okay, I didn't get why. Deffer newer version until we get
> an
> agreement o
On Wed, 2016-11-02 at 11:55 +, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> Hi Andy,
> Could you possibly tell me your ideas about these changes?
> Thanks.
Thanks for an update, but, please, answer to all my comments to your
patch v2. Either you are okay with them, then you didn't address few, or
you are not okay
Hi Andy,
Could you possibly tell me your ideas about these changes?
Thanks.
On Fri, 2016-10-28 at 18:59 +0300, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> This series is to address a proposal by Andy in these threads:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/dmaengine/msg11506.html
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/dmaengine/msg
On Fri, 2016-10-28 at 18:59 +0300, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> This series is to address a proposal by Andy in these threads:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/dmaengine/msg11506.html
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/dmaengine/msg11541.html
> Split platform data to actual hardware properties, and platform
This series is to address a proposal by Andy in these threads:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/dmaengine/msg11506.html
http://www.spinics.net/lists/dmaengine/msg11541.html
Split platform data to actual hardware properties, and platform quirks.
Now we able to use quirks and hardware properties separate
