Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] ARC: timer: Build gfrc, rtc under same option (64-bit timers)

2016-11-03 Thread Daniel Lezcano
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 02:31:37PM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote: > The original distinction was done as they were deveoped at different s/deveoped/developed/ > times and primarily becuse they are specific to UP (RTC) and SMP (GFRC). s/becuse/because/ > > But given that driver now handles that at

[PATCH v2 06/10] ARC: timer: Build gfrc, rtc under same option (64-bit timers)

2016-11-03 Thread Vineet Gupta
The original distinction was done as they were deveoped at different times and primarily becuse they are specific to UP (RTC) and SMP (GFRC). But given that driver now handles that at runtime, (i.e. not allowing RTC as clocksource in SMP), we can simplify things a bit. Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta