On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 2:36 AM Mike Rapoport wrote:
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 07:14:13PM -0500, Adam Ford wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 8:33 AM Adam Ford wrote:
> > >
> > > I am attaching two logs. I now the mailing lists will be unhappy, but
> > > don't want to try and spam
Hi Adam,
On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 07:14:13PM -0500, Adam Ford wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 8:33 AM Adam Ford wrote:
> >
> > I am attaching two logs. I now the mailing lists will be unhappy, but
> > don't want to try and spam a bunch of log through the mailing liast.
> > The two logs show the
On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 8:33 AM Adam Ford wrote:
>
> I am attaching two logs. I now the mailing lists will be unhappy, but
> don't want to try and spam a bunch of log through the mailing liast.
> The two logs show the differences between the working and non-working
> imx6q 3D accelerator when tr
I am attaching two logs. I now the mailing lists will be unhappy, but
don't want to try and spam a bunch of log through the mailing liast.
The two logs show the differences between the working and non-working
imx6q 3D accelerator when trying to run a simple glmark2-es2-drm demo.
The only change
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 02:35:53PM -0500, Adam Ford wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 11:04 AM Mike Rapoport wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 08:09:52AM -0500, Adam Ford wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:17 AM Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 9:1
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 11:04 AM Mike Rapoport wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 08:09:52AM -0500, Adam Ford wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:17 AM Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 9:17 AM Adam Ford wrote:
> > >
> > > > I tried cma=256M and noticed the cma d
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 08:09:52AM -0500, Adam Ford wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:17 AM Fabio Estevam wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 9:17 AM Adam Ford wrote:
> >
> > > I tried cma=256M and noticed the cma dump at the beginning didn't
> > > change. Do we need to setup a reserve
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:17 AM Fabio Estevam wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 9:17 AM Adam Ford wrote:
>
> > I tried cma=256M and noticed the cma dump at the beginning didn't
> > change. Do we need to setup a reserved-memory node like
> > imx6ul-ccimx6ulsom.dtsi did?
>
> I don't think so.
>
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 9:17 AM Adam Ford wrote:
> I tried cma=256M and noticed the cma dump at the beginning didn't
> change. Do we need to setup a reserved-memory node like
> imx6ul-ccimx6ulsom.dtsi did?
I don't think so.
Were you able to identify what was the exact commit that caused such r
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 7:12 AM Fabio Estevam wrote:
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 6:38 AM Adam Ford wrote:
>
> > I know it's rather late, but this patch broke the Etnaviv 3D graphics
> > in my i.MX6Q.
> >
> > When I try to use the 3D, it returns some errors and the dmesg log
> > shows
Hi Adam,
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 6:38 AM Adam Ford wrote:
> I know it's rather late, but this patch broke the Etnaviv 3D graphics
> in my i.MX6Q.
>
> When I try to use the 3D, it returns some errors and the dmesg log
> shows some memory allocation errors too:
> [3.682347] etnaviv etnaviv: bo
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 2:05 AM Mike Rapoport wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Current memblock API is quite extensive and, which is more annoying,
> duplicated. Except the low-level functions that allow searching for a free
> memory region and marking it as reserved, memblock provides three (well,
> two and a
Hi,
Current memblock API is quite extensive and, which is more annoying,
duplicated. Except the low-level functions that allow searching for a free
memory region and marking it as reserved, memblock provides three (well,
two and a half) sets of functions to allocate memory. There are several
overl
13 matches
Mail list logo
