* Peter Zijlstra [220608 14:52]:
> arch_cpu_idle() is a very simple idle interface and exposes only a
> single idle state and is expected to not require RCU and not do any
> tracing/instrumentation.
>
> As such, omap_sram_idle() is not a valid implementation. Replace it
> with the simple (shallow
On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 10:39:22AM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Arnd Bergmann [220608 18:18]:
> > On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 4:27 PM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > >
> > > arch_cpu_idle() is a very simple idle interface and exposes only a
> > > single idle state and is expected to not require RCU and n
On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 06:28:33PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 4:27 PM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > arch_cpu_idle() is a very simple idle interface and exposes only a
> > single idle state and is expected to not require RCU and not do any
> > tracing/instrumentation.
> >
* Arnd Bergmann [220608 18:18]:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 4:27 PM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > arch_cpu_idle() is a very simple idle interface and exposes only a
> > single idle state and is expected to not require RCU and not do any
> > tracing/instrumentation.
> >
> > As such, omap_sram_idle()
On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 4:27 PM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> arch_cpu_idle() is a very simple idle interface and exposes only a
> single idle state and is expected to not require RCU and not do any
> tracing/instrumentation.
>
> As such, omap_sram_idle() is not a valid implementation. Replace it
> wit
arch_cpu_idle() is a very simple idle interface and exposes only a
single idle state and is expected to not require RCU and not do any
tracing/instrumentation.
As such, omap_sram_idle() is not a valid implementation. Replace it
with the simple (shallow) omap3_do_wfi() call. Leaving the more
compli
