On Friday 15 January 2016 06:47 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> I also don't think there's anything architecture
>> > specific about requiring DEVTMPFS or not, so I'd say it doesn't make any
>> > sense to select it from arch/arc/Kconfig.
> You are indeed right - Kconfig is not the "ideal" place to add
On 2016-01-16 12:00, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> >> We changed to devtmpfs by default in Buildroot quite some time ago, and
> >> I'm pretty happy with it.
> > We need to have dynamically created device nodes anyway - for managing
> > permissions, being able to change names, etc. Because of that, d
> "Felix" == Felix Fietkau writes:
Hi,
>> Out of interest, why is that? Devtmpfs got added 7 years ago (2.6.32) -
>> And is easy to backport if really needed, is easier and more flexible
>> than a bunch of static mknods, and probably smaller as well.
> We don't need to backport anything.
On 2016-01-16 11:35, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>> "Felix" == Felix Fietkau writes:
>
> >>> OpenWrt works just fine without DEVTMPFS - doesn't matter if initramfs
> >>> is enabled or not.
> >>
> >> The discussion is about adding a patch to up upstream ARC kernel, not
> specific to
> >> ope
> "Felix" == Felix Fietkau writes:
>>> OpenWrt works just fine without DEVTMPFS - doesn't matter if initramfs
>>> is enabled or not.
>>
>> The discussion is about adding a patch to up upstream ARC kernel, not
>> specific to
>> openwrt.
> Right. I belive that the upstream kernel shoul
On 2016-01-15 14:17, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On Friday 15 January 2016 06:29 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> +Subject: [PATCH 1/2] openwrt: arc - remove dependency on DEVTMPFS
>> +
>> +OpenWRT builds initramfs so that it doesn't require DEVTMPFS so
>> dropping
>>
On Friday 15 January 2016 06:29 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> +Subject: [PATCH 1/2] openwrt: arc - remove dependency on DEVTMPFS
> +
> +OpenWRT builds initramfs so that it doesn't require DEVTMPFS so
> dropping
> +this dependency.
>> >
>> > Really ? AFAIKR (c
On 2016-01-15 13:25, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> +CC Thomas, Peter
>
> On Friday 15 January 2016 04:19 PM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
>> Hi Felix,
>>
>> On Fri, 2016-01-15 at 11:45 +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>>> On 2016-01-15 00:12, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
Given those patches are relevant to any ARC plat
+CC Thomas, Peter
On Friday 15 January 2016 04:19 PM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> Hi Felix,
>
> On Fri, 2016-01-15 at 11:45 +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> On 2016-01-15 00:12, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
>>> Given those patches are relevant to any ARC platform and even
>>> ISA version it makes perfect sense
Hi Felix,
On Fri, 2016-01-15 at 11:45 +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2016-01-15 00:12, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> > Given those patches are relevant to any ARC platform and even
> > ISA version it makes perfect sense for patches to exist
> > in one place instead of being duplicated for each new ARC
10 matches
Mail list logo
