>From: Vineet Gupta
>Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2020 00:10
>To: Eugeniy Paltsev; linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
>Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Alexey Brodkin
>Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARC: don't align ret_from_exception function
>
>On 3/11/20 1:58 PM, Eugeniy Palt
On 3/11/20 1:58 PM, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
>>
>> I would like to keep it aligned.
>>
>> ARC700 definitely has penalty for unaligned branch targets, so it will
>> definitely
>> suffer there.
>
> Do you know some exact numbers? I'm not an expert in ARC700 (fortunately =)
I don't remember the exact
>From: Vineet Gupta
>Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 20:38
>To: Eugeniy Paltsev; linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
>Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Alexey Brodkin
>Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARC: don't align ret_from_exception function
>
>On 3/11/20 9:26 AM, Eugeniy Pa
On 3/11/20 9:26 AM, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> ARC have a tricky implemented ret_from_exception function.
> It is written on ASM and can be called like regular function.
> However it has another 'entry point' as it can be called as a
> continuation of EV_Trap function.
It is not really intended / ne
ARC have a tricky implemented ret_from_exception function.
It is written on ASM and can be called like regular function.
However it has another 'entry point' as it can be called as a
continuation of EV_Trap function.
As we declare "ret_from_exception" using ENTRY macro it may align
"ret_from_excep
