Re: [PATCH 10/17] arm64: generate 64-bit syscall.tbl

2024-07-10 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 10:57:25AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Thanks for the report! I just panicked a bit and thought I had > done something entirely wrong here, but after having a closer > look it turned out to be a silly typo: > -#include > +#include Doh, I should've spotted that even fr

Re: [PATCH 10/17] arm64: generate 64-bit syscall.tbl

2024-07-10 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tue, Jul 9, 2024, at 19:23, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 04:36:04PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> #define __ARCH_WANT_SYS_CLONE >> +#define __ARCH_WANT_NEW_STAT >> >> -#ifndef __COMPAT_SYSCALL_NR >> -#include >> -#endif >> +#include > > It looks like this is causing widesp

Re: [PATCH 10/17] arm64: generate 64-bit syscall.tbl

2024-07-09 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 04:36:04PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > #define __ARCH_WANT_SYS_CLONE > +#define __ARCH_WANT_NEW_STAT > > -#ifndef __COMPAT_SYSCALL_NR > -#include > -#endif > +#include It looks like this is causing widespread build breakage in kselftest in -next for arm64, there are

Re: [PATCH 10/17] arm64: generate 64-bit syscall.tbl

2024-07-05 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 04:36:04PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > From: Arnd Bergmann > > Change the asm/unistd.h header for arm64 to no longer include > asm-generic/unistd.h itself, but instead generate both the asm/unistd.h > contents and the list of entry points using the syscall.tbl scripts th

[PATCH 10/17] arm64: generate 64-bit syscall.tbl

2024-07-04 Thread Arnd Bergmann
From: Arnd Bergmann Change the asm/unistd.h header for arm64 to no longer include asm-generic/unistd.h itself, but instead generate both the asm/unistd.h contents and the list of entry points using the syscall.tbl scripts that we use on most other architectures. Once his is done for the remainin