On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 07:08:33PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 10/01/2023 à 08:19, Vineet Gupta a écrit :
> >
> > On 1/8/23 11:04, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> > > In an attempt to simplify some includes in , it
> > > appeared, when compiling fs/ecryptfs/dentry.c, that
> > >
> > > was re
Le 10/01/2023 à 08:19, Vineet Gupta a écrit :
On 1/8/23 11:04, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
In an attempt to simplify some includes in , it
appeared, when compiling fs/ecryptfs/dentry.c, that
was relying on other includes to get the definition of cpu_relax().
(see [1])
It broke on arc.
It it
On 1/8/23 11:04, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
In an attempt to simplify some includes in , it
appeared, when compiling fs/ecryptfs/dentry.c, that
was relying on other includes to get the definition of cpu_relax().
(see [1])
It broke on arc.
It its just ARC that broke, maybe we can do something
On Sun, 8 Jan 2023 20:04:44 +0100 Christophe JAILLET
wrote:
> In an attempt to simplify some includes in , it
> appeared, when compiling fs/ecryptfs/dentry.c, that
> was relying on other includes to get the definition of cpu_relax().
> (see [1])
>
> It broke on arc.
>
> Include in to fix t
On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 08:04:44PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> In an attempt to simplify some includes in , it
> appeared, when compiling fs/ecryptfs/dentry.c, that
> was relying on other includes to get the definition of cpu_relax().
> (see [1])
>
> It broke on arc.
>
> Include in to f
In an attempt to simplify some includes in , it
appeared, when compiling fs/ecryptfs/dentry.c, that
was relying on other includes to get the definition of cpu_relax().
(see [1])
It broke on arc.
Include in to fix the issue.
This will help remove some un-needed includes from .
[1]: https://lor
