Hi Vineet,
On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 05:05 +, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On Monday 15 February 2016 10:07 PM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> > Current implementation of __delay() function uses so-called
> > zero-delay loops. And the only condition to exit that loop is
> > LP_COUNT (loop count register) = 1 (b
On Monday 15 February 2016 10:07 PM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> Current implementation of __delay() function uses so-called
> zero-delay loops. And the only condition to exit that loop is
> LP_COUNT (loop count register) = 1 (but not 0 as it might be easily
> imagined).
So u can fix this better by do
Current implementation of __delay() function uses so-called
zero-delay loops. And the only condition to exit that loop is
LP_COUNT (loop count register) = 1 (but not 0 as it might be easily
imagined).
So if our calculation of "loops" gives 0 (and that is pretty possible
given result of multiplicat
