On 11/20/18 2:30 AM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> By default NFSv3 doesn't support ACL (Access Control Lists)
> which might be quite convenient to have so that
> mounted NFS behaves exactly as any other local file-system.
>
> In particular missing support of ACL makes umask useless.
> This among other t
Hi Vineet,
> -Original Message-
> From: Vineet Gupta
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 8:40 PM
> To: Alexey Brodkin ; linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Cupertino Miranda ;
> sta...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] arc: [d
On 11/20/18 2:30 AM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> By default NFSv3 doesn't support ACL (Access Control Lists)
> which might be quite convenient to have so that
> mounted NFS behaves exactly as any other local file-system.
>
> In particular missing support of ACL makes umask useless.
> This among other t
Hi,
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag.
The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all
The bot has tested the following trees: v4.19.2, v4.18.19, v4.14.81, v4.9.137,
v4.4.163, v3.18.125.
v4.19.2: Build OK!
v4.
By default NFSv3 doesn't support ACL (Access Control Lists)
which might be quite convenient to have so that
mounted NFS behaves exactly as any other local file-system.
In particular missing support of ACL makes umask useless.
This among other thigs fixes Glibc's "nptl/tst-umask1".
Signed-off-by:
