Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 0/7] Introduce __xchg, non-atomic xchg

2024-04-05 Thread Jani Nikula
ke it I will be happy. > > OK, I'll go queue it in tip/locking/core after -rc1. Thanks! Is this where the series fell between the cracks, or was there some follow-up that I missed? I think this would still be useful. Andrzej, would you mind rebasing and resending if there are no objections? BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel ___ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc

Re: [PATCH] fix double ;;s in code

2018-02-20 Thread Jani Nikula
one conflict down the line because it touches the kernel all over the place, then IMO it already wasn't worth it. Merge conflicts are inevitable, but there's no reason to make life harder just to cater for a cleanup patch. It's not that important. Had it been split up, the d