On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 06:40:30PM +, Brendan Jackman wrote:
> Add a boot time parameter to control the newly added X86_FEATURE_ASI.
> "asi=on" or "asi=off" can be used in the kernel command line to enable
> or disable ASI at boot time. If not specified, ASI enablement depends
> on CONFIG_ADDRE
On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 02:53:03PM +0100, Brendan Jackman wrote:
> Argh, sorry, GMail switched back to HTML mode somehow. Maybe I have to
> get a proper mail client after all.
Yap, wouldn't be such a bad idea. And yes, it ain't easy - we have a whole doc
about it:
Documentation/process/email-clie
On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 06:40:29PM +, Brendan Jackman wrote:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 03/29] mm: asi: Introduce ASI core API
x86/asi: ...
> Introduce core API for Address Space Isolation (ASI). Kernel address
> space isolation provides the ability to run some kernel
> code with a restric
On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 06:40:28PM +, Brendan Jackman wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index
> 7b9a7e8f39acc8e9aeb7d4213e87d71047865f5c..5a50582eb210e9d1309856a737d32b76fa1bfc85
> 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -2519,6 +2519,20 @@ conf
On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 02:22:42PM +0100, Brendan Jackman wrote:
> Sure. I'm actually not even sure that for a [PATCH]-quality thing this
> cross-cutting commit even makes sense - once we've decided on the
> general way to solve this problem, perhaps the changes should just be
> part of the commit
On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 01:18:58AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Long story short, lemme try to poke around tomorrow to try to figure out what
> actually happens. It could be caused by the part of Rik's patches and this one
> inlining things. We'll see...
Looks transient.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 06:40:27PM +, Brendan Jackman wrote:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 01/29] mm: asi: Make some utility functions
> noinstr compatible
The tip tree preferred format for patch subject prefixes is
'subsys/component:', e.g. 'x86/apic:', 'x86/mm/fault:', 'sched/fair:',
'genirq
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 10:35:03AM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
> I agree, it makes the code harder to read for someone who is not
> familiar with all the %p magic we have (like me).
+1
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
_
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 02:29:29PM -0800, Rick Edgecombe wrote:
> [0]
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0e29a2d0-08d8-bcd6-ff26-4bea0e403...@redhat.com/#t
I guess that sub-thread about how you arrived at this "pass a VMA"
decision should be in the Link tag. But that's for the committer, I'd
say.
Th
ul Burton
> Cc: James Hogan
> Cc: Ley Foon Tan
> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> Cc: Paul Mackerras
> Cc: Michael Ellerman
> Cc: Rich Felker
> Cc: "David S. Miller"
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner
> Cc: Ingo Molnar
> Cc: Borislav Petkov
> Cc: x...@kernel.org
>
buffer);
>
> Replace print_symbol() with a direct printk("%pS") call.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky
> Cc: Tony Luck
> Cc: Borislav Petkov
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 3 +--
> arch/x86/mm/mmio-mod.c
s - and as such it's part of the UAPI. I don't think you can
> > remove it unless you can guarantee there are no userspace users.
> I keep it in the v2 of the series, but the maintainer, Borislav Petkov, asks
> me
> to un-export it.
>
> I will follow the maintainer de
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 10:43:56AM +0100, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> This header file is exported, thus move it to uapi.
It should rather not be exported - please remove it from
arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild instead.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid t
13 matches
Mail list logo
