On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 11:38:55PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Geert Uytterhoeven writes:
> > Hi Christophe,
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 11:21 AM Christophe Leroy
> > wrote:
> >> >>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/personality.h
> >> >>> b/include/uapi/linux/personality.h
> >> >>> index
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 07:21:27PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 05:45:07PM -0700, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 03:08:14PM -0400, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
> > > * Catalin Marinas [240906 07:44]:
> > > > On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 09:55:42AM +, Arnd Be
On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 05:45:07PM -0700, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 03:08:14PM -0400, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
> > * Catalin Marinas [240906 07:44]:
> > > On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 09:55:42AM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2024, at 09:14, Guo Ren wrote:
> > >
"Arnd Bergmann" writes:
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2024, at 23:22, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 10:52:34AM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 09:14:08AM GMT, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> The intent is to optionally be able to run a process that keeps higher bits
>>> f
Charlie Jenkins writes:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 04:59:40PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Charlie Jenkins writes:
>> > Create a personality flag ADDR_LIMIT_47BIT to support applications
>> > that wish to transition from running in environments that support at
>> > most 47-bit VAs to environm
Geert Uytterhoeven writes:
> Hi Christophe,
>
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 11:21 AM Christophe Leroy
> wrote:
>> >>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/personality.h
>> >>> b/include/uapi/linux/personality.h
>> >>> index 49796b7756af..cd3b8c154d9b 100644
>> >>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/personality.h
>
On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 10:49:40AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Sep 2024 17:34:48 +0300
> Mike Rapoport wrote:
>
> > > This is insane, just force BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT
> >
> > The comment in ftrace.c says "... while mcount loc in modules can not be
> > sorted at build time"
> >
>
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024, at 00:45, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 03:08:14PM -0400, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
>
> I responded to Arnd in the other thread, but I am still not convinced
> that the solution that x86 and arm64 have selected is the best solution.
> The solution of defaulting
