Hi Peter,
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 20:43:49 +0100
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Robot reported that trace_hardirqs_{on,off}() tickle the forbidden
> _rcuidle() tracepoint through local_irq_{en,dis}able().
>
> For 'sane' configs, these calls will only happen with RCU enabled and
> as such can use the regul
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 08:43:14PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Hi All!
Hi Peter,
> The (hopefully) final respin of cpuidle vs rcu cleanup patches. Barring any
> objections I'll be queueing these patches in tip/sched/core in the next few
> days.
I'm sorry to have to bear some bad news on that
On 21/12/22 13:28, Pavel.Kozlov--- via Libc-alpha wrote:
> From: Pavel Kozlov
>
> Add extra check for compiler definitions to ensure that compiler provides
> sqrt and fma hw fpu instructions else use software implementation.
>
> As divide/sqrt and FMA hw support from CPU side is optional,
> t
On 21/12/22 13:19, Pavel.Kozlov--- via Libc-alpha wrote:
> From: Pavel Kozlov
>
> The ARCv2 ABI requires 4 byte stack pointer alignment. Don't allow to
> use unaligned child stack in clone. As the stack grows down,
> align it down.
>
> This was pointed by misc/tst-misalign-clone-internal and
On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 10:54 AM Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> __xchg will be used for non-atomic xchg macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda
> Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann
> ---
> v2: squashed all arch patches into one
> v3: fixed alpha/xchg_local, thx to l...@intel.com
> v4: adjusted indentation (Heiko
