Re: [PATCH] cacheflush.2: Document Architecture-specific variants

Hi Alex On 12/14/20 3:38 PM, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar > --- > > Hi Michael, > > Please apply this patch after > '[PATCH v5] cacheflush.2: Document __builtin___clear_cache() as a more > portable alternative'. Thanks. Applied. > man2/cacheflush.2 | 42 ++

Re: [PATCH v6] cacheflush.2: Document __builtin___clear_cache() as a more portable alternative

On 12/15/20 2:30 PM, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > Reported-by: Heinrich Schuchardt > Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar > Cc: Martin Sebor > Cc: Dave Martin > --- > > v6: > - GCC has always exposed 'void *', as Martin Sebor noted. > It's Clang (and maybe others) that (following GCC's docs) > e

Ping: [PATCH] cacheflush.2: Document Architecture-specific variants

Ping On 12/14/20 3:38 PM, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar > --- > > Hi Michael, > > Please apply this patch after > '[PATCH v5] cacheflush.2: Document __builtin___clear_cache() as a more > portable alternative'. > > Thanks, > > Alex > > man2/cacheflush.2 | 42 ++

Ping: [PATCH v6] cacheflush.2: Document __builtin___clear_cache() as a more portable alternative

Ping On 12/15/20 2:30 PM, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > Reported-by: Heinrich Schuchardt > Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar > Cc: Martin Sebor > Cc: Dave Martin > --- > > v6: > - GCC has always exposed 'void *', as Martin Sebor noted. > It's Clang (and maybe others) that (following GCC's docs)