>
> > ...
> > Starting syslogd: BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#0, S01syslogd/139
> > lock: 0xf53ef350, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: S01syslogd/139, .owner_cpu: 0
> > CPU: 0 PID: 139 Comm: S01syslogd Not tainted 5.7.0-next-20200603 #1
> > [f0067d00 :
> > do_
> >>> Is there another test I need to run?
> > >>
> > >> This all petered out, but as I understand it, this patchset still might
> > >> have issues on various architectures.
> > >>
> > >> Can folks please provide an update on t
gt; lock: 0xf53ef350, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: S01syslogd/139, .owner_cpu: 0
> CPU: 0 PID: 139 Comm: S01syslogd Not tainted 5.7.0-next-20200603 #1
> [f0067d00 :
> do_raw_spin_lock+0xa8/0xd8 ]
> [f00d598c :
> copy_page_range+0x328/0x804 ]
> [f0025c34 :
> dup_mm+0x334/0x4
s that -next is in pretty bad shape right now.
> The summary of my tests says:
>
> Build results:
> total: 151 pass: 130 fail: 21
> Qemu test results:
> total: 430 pass: 375 fail: 55
>
> sparc32 smp images in next-20200603 still crash for me with a spinlock
>
atus?
> >
> > I believe the tests were failing for Guenter due to another patch set...[1]
> >
> > My tests with just this series are working.
> >
> >>From my understanding the other failures were unrelated.[2]
> >
> >
> > I've
mmots which already has
> Ira's patches and it booted fine. I've used sparc32_defconfig to build
> the kernel and qemu-system-sparc with default machine and CPU.
>
>
> Mike, am I wrong? Do you think the kmap() patches are still causing issues?
>
For my pa
On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 01:57:36PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 21 May 2020 10:42:50 -0700 Ira Weiny wrote:
>
> > > >
> > > > Actually it occurs to me that the patch consolidating kmap_prot is odd
> > > > for
> > > > sparc 32 bit...
> > > >
> > > > Its a long shot but could you try re
On Thu, 21 May 2020 10:42:50 -0700 Ira Weiny wrote:
> > >
> > > Actually it occurs to me that the patch consolidating kmap_prot is odd for
> > > sparc 32 bit...
> > >
> > > Its a long shot but could you try reverting this patch?
> > >
> > > 4ea7d2419e3f kmap: consolidate kmap_prot definitions
On 6/3/20 1:04 PM, Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha wrote:
>
>
> On 03/06/2020 16:46, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> On 5/29/20 9:49 AM, Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha wrote:
+ ; - child starts here -
+
+ ; Setup TP register (only recent kernels v4.19+ do that)
+ an
On 03/06/2020 16:46, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 5/29/20 9:49 AM, Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha wrote:
>>> + ; - child starts here -
>>> +
>>> + ; Setup TP register (only recent kernels v4.19+ do that)
>>> + and.f 0, r12, CLONE_SETTLS
>>> + mov.nz r25, r9
>> Do you still
On 22/04/2020 22:41, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta
Some comments below.
> ---
> config.h.in| 3 +
> sysdeps/arc/Implies| 3 +
> sysdeps/arc/Makefile | 21 +++
> sysdeps/arc/V
On 5/29/20 9:49 AM, Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha wrote:
>> +; - child starts here -
>> +
>> +; Setup TP register (only recent kernels v4.19+ do that)
>> +and.f 0, r12, CLONE_SETTLS
>> +mov.nz r25, r9
> Do you still need to set it since the minimum supported kerne
On 6/3/20 10:09 AM, Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha wrote:
> I think this patchset is ok, there is no need to send a v4. Do you
> need someone to push it upstream for you?
I do have write access to repo, I'll push it shortly.
Thx,
-Vineet
___
linux-s
On 03/06/2020 14:06, Vineet Gupta via Libc-alpha wrote:
> On 6/3/20 1:46 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> s/iee754/ieee754/
>
> Fixed. Thx
>
I think this patchset is ok, there is no need to send a v4. Do you
need someone to push it upstream for you?
_
On 6/3/20 1:46 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> s/iee754/ieee754/
Fixed. Thx
___
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
s/iee754/ieee754/
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for something completely different."
___
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.o
16 matches
Mail list logo
