On 06/10/2019 10:27 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 6/9/19 9:34 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>> Do you really think this is easier to read?
>>>
>>> Why not just move the x86 version to include/linux/kprobes.h, and replace
>>> the int with bool?
>> Will just return bool directly without an additiona
On 6/9/19 9:34 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> Do you really think this is easier to read?
>>
>> Why not just move the x86 version to include/linux/kprobes.h, and replace
>> the int with bool?
> Will just return bool directly without an additional variable here as
> suggested
> before. But for the
On 06/08/2019 01:42 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> Before:
>
>> @@ -46,23 +46,6 @@ kmmio_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long addr)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static nokprobe_inline int kprobes_fault(struct pt_regs *regs)
>> -{
>> -if (!kprobes_built_in())
>> -return 0;
[ Upstream commit bf561d3c13423fc54daa19b5d49dc15fafdb7acc ]
While cross building perf to the ARC architecture on a fedora 30 host,
we were failing with:
CC /tmp/build/perf/bench/numa.o
bench/numa.c: In function ‘worker_thread’:
bench/numa.c:1261:12: error: ‘RUSAGE_THREAD’ undecla
BIT(), GENMASK(), etc. are useful to define register bits of hardware.
However, low-level code is often written in assembly, where they are
not available due to the hard-coded 1UL, 0UL.
In fact, in-kernel headers such as arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
use _BITUL() instead of BIT() so that the reg
Now that BIT() can be used from assembly code, we can safely replace
_BITUL() with equivalent BIT().
UAPI headers are still required to use _BITUL(), but there is no more
reason to use it in kernel headers. BIT() is shorter.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada
---
arch/arc/include/asm/pgtable.h
