On Thu, 4 Apr 2019 21:17:58 +0300
"Dmitry V. Levin" wrote:
> There are several places listed below where I'd prefer to see more readable
> equivalents, but feel free to leave it to respective arch maintainers.
I was going to do similar changes, but figured I'd do just that (let
the arch maintain
On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 6:45 AM Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
>
> At Linux Plumbers, Andy Lutomirski approached me and pointed out that the
> function call syscall_get_arguments() implemented in x86 was horribly
> written and not optimized for the standard case of pass
On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 6:45 AM Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)"
>
> After removing the start and count arguments of syscall_get_arguments() it
> seems reasonable to remove them from syscall_set_arguments(). Note, as of
> today, there are no users of syscall_set_arguments(
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 09:41:09AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
>
> At Linux Plumbers, Andy Lutomirski approached me and pointed out that the
> function call syscall_get_arguments() implemented in x86 was horribly
> written and not optimized for the standard cas
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 09:41:10AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)"
>
> After removing the start and count arguments of syscall_get_arguments() it
> seems reasonable to remove them from syscall_set_arguments(). Note, as of
> today, there are no users of syscall_set_a
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)"
>
> After removing the start and count arguments of syscall_get_arguments() it
> seems reasonable to remove them from syscall_set_arguments(). Note, as of
> today, there are no users of syscall_set_arguments(). But we ar
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)"
>
> At Linux Plumbers, Andy Lutomirski approached me and pointed out that the
> function call syscall_get_arguments() implemented in x86 was horribly
> written and not optimized for the standard case of passing in 0 and
