On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 09:18:09AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The current PCI_DMA_BUS_IS_PHYS decided if a dma implementation is bound
> by the dma mask in the device because it directly maps to a physical
> address range (modulo an offset in the device), or if it is virtualized
> by an iomm
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 09:18:26AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Life the code from x86 so that we behave consistently. In the future we
> should probably warn if any of these is set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson
> ---
> arch/cris/arch-v32/drivers/pci/dma
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 09:18:38AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> cris currently has an incomplete direct mapping dma_map_ops implementation
> is PCI support is enabled. Replace it with the fully feature generic
> dma-direct implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
For CRIS:
Ack
On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 09:49:30AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 08:45:30PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Christoph Hellwig writes:
> >
> > > We want to use the dma_direct_ namespace for a generic implementation,
> > > so rename powerpc to the second best choice:
