On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 04:25:35PM +, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Mon, 2017-06-26 at 10:51 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Eugeniy Paltsev
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Alexey Brodkin
> > >
>
> [snip]
>
> > > +
> > > + chosen {
> > > +
On 06/28/2017 12:30 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jun 2017, Vineet Gupta wrote:
I see no references to ucontext at all in ARC libgcc (ARC doesn't have a
linux-unwind.h file).
Those bits are still in flight, Claudiu ?
-Vineet
___
linux-snps-arc
On Wed, 28 Jun 2017, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 06/27/2017 02:56 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > > +/* Userlevel context. */
> > > +typedef struct ucontext
> > > + {
> > > +unsigned long uc_flags;
> > > +struct ucontext *uc_link;
> > This is now struct ucontext_t.
>
> Isn't this an ABI change
[ignoring newsgroups]
On 28/06/17 09:48, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 06/27/2017 02:56 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
>>> +/* Userlevel context. */
>>> +typedef struct ucontext
>>> + {
>>> +unsigned long uc_flags;
>>> +struct ucontext *uc_link;
>> This is now struct ucontext_t.
>
> Isn't this an A
On 06/27/2017 02:56 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
+/* Userlevel context. */
+typedef struct ucontext
+ {
+unsigned long uc_flags;
+struct ucontext *uc_link;
This is now struct ucontext_t.
Isn't this an ABI change. After making change as you suggested, building
gcc/libgcc itself fails now
