On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While cleaning Samsung ARM defconfigs with savedefconfig, I encountered
> similar obsolete entries in other files.
>
> Except the ARM, no dependencies.
> For ARM, the rest of patches depend on the first change (otherwise
> it mig
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 10:28:50AM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 06/09/2017 04:13 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 01:05:06PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > > The spinlock based atomics should be SC, that is, none of them appear to
> > > place extra barriers in atomic_
On 06/09/2017 04:13 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 01:05:06PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
The spinlock based atomics should be SC, that is, none of them appear to
place extra barriers in atomic_cmpxchg() or any of the other SC atomic
primitives and therefore seem to rely on
