On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 09:51:35AM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 09/27/2016 09:37 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 07:53:56 -0700
> > Vineet Gupta wrote:
> >
> >> > This doesn't seem to be used anywhere
> > I thought so too, until I got this response for an equivalent patch:
> >
Hi Peter,
On 11/17/2015 05:15 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 06:23:21PM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> On Tuesday 17 November 2015 05:55 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>
>>> This is assuming you now have these NMIs we talked about earlier. If all
>>> you have are regular IRQs this
On 09/27/2016 09:37 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 07:53:56 -0700
> Vineet Gupta wrote:
>
>> > This doesn't seem to be used anywhere
> I thought so too, until I got this response for an equivalent patch:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/31/53
So this is some sort of "developer sh
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 07:53:56 -0700
Vineet Gupta wrote:
> This doesn't seem to be used anywhere
I thought so too, until I got this response for an equivalent patch:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/31/53
Kim
___
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc
This doesn't seem to be used anywhere
Cc: Andrew Morton
Cc: Kees Cook
Cc: Johannes Weiner
Cc: Tejun Heo
Cc: Arnd Bergmann
Cc: Petr Mladek
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel
Cc: Thomas Garnier
Cc: Nicolas Pitre
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
Sig