On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 01:28:45PM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 09/06/2016 01:22 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> > > Not "we need to support gcc6 for
> > > old kernels", as really, if someone wants to update userspace, they
> > > don't update their kernel?
>
> FWIW, I'm not arguing for the backport i
On 09/06/2016 01:22 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> > Not "we need to support gcc6 for
> > old kernels", as really, if someone wants to update userspace, they
> > don't update their kernel?
FWIW, I'm not arguing for the backport inclusion - I'm just trying to explain
the
context more.
Thing is your re
On 09/06/2016 12:39 PM, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 09:50:46AM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> On 09/05/2016 06:03 AM, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
>>> The patch below was submitted to be applied to the 4.7-stable tree.
>>>
>>> I fail to see how this patch meets t
On 9/6/2016 4:57 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 04:49:37PM +0100, Joao Pinto wrote:
>> To fix this, this patch adds ARC as a PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN supportive
>> platform and adds the generation of msi.h in the ARC arch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Joao Pinto
>
> I added Vineet's ack and
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 04:49:37PM +0100, Joao Pinto wrote:
> To fix this, this patch adds ARC as a PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN supportive
> platform and adds the generation of msi.h in the ARC arch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joao Pinto
I added Vineet's ack and put this on pci/msi for v4.9, thanks!
> ---
> ar
Hi Bjorn,
Did you have the chance to check this patch?
Thanks.
On 8/10/2016 6:55 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 08/09/2016 08:51 AM, Joao Pinto wrote:
>> Due to the added dependency on PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN for all PCIe RC
>> drivers, we were unable to build a RC solution for an ARC platform.
>>
>> T
