On 07/29/2016 03:46 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
What you want is
2016-05-19 09439560b9f9 toolchain: bump ARC tools to arc-2016.03 release
which seems to be present in released 2016.05, but when I checkout 2016.05 tag
(or
aa6fd11feebff) that patch is not there !
A toolchain build off SHA 0943956
On 07/29/2016 02:48 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Yeah there's a 4.8.5 based one (referred to as GNU 2016.03) - will prebuilt
toolchain suffice or would you prefer building on your own. Prebuilt could
be
found below.
https://github.com/foss-for-synopsys-dwc-arc-processors/
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 01:03:56PM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 07/29/2016 06:43 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 07/28/2016 10:20 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> >> Hi Guenter,
> >>
> >> On 07/28/2016 08:23 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>> Hi Vineet,
> >>>
> >>> Mainline fails to build arcv2 images with
On 07/29/2016 06:43 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 07/28/2016 10:20 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> Hi Guenter,
>>
>> On 07/28/2016 08:23 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> Hi Vineet,
>>>
>>> Mainline fails to build arcv2 images with the following error.
>>>
>>> {standard input}: Assembler messages:
>>> {stand
Hi Linus,
Please pull.
Thx,
-Vineet
->
The following changes since commit 92d21ac74a9e3c09b0b01c764e530657e4c85c49:
Linux 4.7-rc7 (2016-07-10 20:24:59 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vgupta/arc.git/ tags/arc-4.8-rc1
for you
On 07/28/2016 10:20 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
Hi Guenter,
On 07/28/2016 08:23 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Hi Vineet,
Mainline fails to build arcv2 images with the following error.
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:19174: Error: Instruction with long immediate data in delay
sl
* Andrew Burgess [2016-07-29 10:43:17 +0100]:
> * Alexey Brodkin [2016-07-29 08:49:22 +]:
>
> > Hi Andrew, all,
> >
> > On Thu, 2016-07-28 at 15:40 -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> > > On 07/28/2016 03:04 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Indeed your 2/2 seems t
* Alexey Brodkin [2016-07-29 08:49:22 +]:
> Hi Andrew, all,
>
> On Thu, 2016-07-28 at 15:40 -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> > On 07/28/2016 03:04 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Indeed your 2/2 seems to be the most "past-proof" code change. So I
> > > > >
> > > > >
Hi Andrew, all,
On Thu, 2016-07-28 at 15:40 -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 07/28/2016 03:04 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Indeed your 2/2 seems to be the most "past-proof" code change. So I
> > > >
> > > > would think it
> > > > is indeed better and is something I should
