Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] add new platform driver for PCI RC

2016-02-05 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 03:39:05PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 05 February 2016 10:44:29 Joao Pinto wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 2/4/2016 11:43 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > >> What do you think? > > > > > > I don't think the "dw" part is relevant (none of the other > > > DesignWare-based

Re: [RFC] perf: fix building for ARCv1

2016-02-05 Thread a...@redhat.com
Em Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 11:18:52AM +, Noam Camus escreveu: > Well here for EZchip I also see the: > undefined reference to `__sync_add_and_fetch_4' > undefined reference to `__sync_sub_and_fetch_4' Yeah, because there is no: tools/arch/arc/include/asm/atomic.h, can't you guys adapt arch/arc/in

Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] add new platform driver for PCI RC

2016-02-05 Thread Joao Pinto
On 2/5/2016 3:43 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 05 February 2016 14:51:39 Joao Pinto wrote: >> >> It is a driver that is useful for PCIe RC prototyping and to be a reference >> platform driver for DesignWare PCIe RC, I don't know if merging some of the >> driver's code into pcie-designware is

Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] add new platform driver for PCI RC

2016-02-05 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Friday 05 February 2016 14:51:39 Joao Pinto wrote: > > It is a driver that is useful for PCIe RC prototyping and to be a reference > platform driver for DesignWare PCIe RC, I don't know if merging some of the > driver's code into pcie-designware is really necessary depends on the > usefulness

Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] add new platform driver for PCI RC

2016-02-05 Thread Joao Pinto
On 2/5/2016 2:39 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 05 February 2016 10:44:29 Joao Pinto wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 2/4/2016 11:43 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: What do you think? >>> >>> I don't think the "dw" part is relevant (none of the other >>> DesignWare-based drivers includes it in the driver

Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] add new platform driver for PCI RC

2016-02-05 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Friday 05 February 2016 10:44:29 Joao Pinto wrote: > Hi, > > On 2/4/2016 11:43 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > >> What do you think? > > > > I don't think the "dw" part is relevant (none of the other > > DesignWare-based drivers includes it in the driver or file name). > > > > How do people typica

Re: [RFC] perf: fix building for ARCv1

2016-02-05 Thread Noam Camus
>From: Vineet Gupta >Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2016 6:13 AM >Noam, what's the atomic story for EZChip. Do you support such things for user space in GNU tools. If -atomic is added to perf user space builds are you guys OK! Well here for EZchip I also s

Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] add new platform driver for PCI RC

2016-02-05 Thread Joao Pinto
Hi, On 2/4/2016 11:43 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> What do you think? > > I don't think the "dw" part is relevant (none of the other > DesignWare-based drivers includes it in the driver or file name). > > How do people typically refer to this board? > > I really like "synopsys" because it fits t