Hi Ian,
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Ian Molton wrote:
> 2009/10/3 Magnus Damm :
>> On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 3:14 AM, Ian Molton wrote:
>
>> 512kHz?
>
> That was an example. I suppose if your HCLK (the input or host clock,
> as named in the TMIO specs) never falls below double the maximum
> MMC
2009/10/3 Magnus Damm :
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 3:14 AM, Ian Molton wrote:
> 512kHz?
That was an example. I suppose if your HCLK (the input or host clock,
as named in the TMIO specs) never falls below double the maximum
MMC/SD bus speed, then you will be ok.
Do _any_ SH platforms actually shar
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 3:14 AM, Ian Molton wrote:
> 2009/10/2 Magnus Damm :
>
>>> I asked if the clock freq. changes - you said 'Well, the goal is
>>> dynamic clocks, but at this point it's dynamic until the clock is
>>> enabled'.
>>>
>>> Since your code doesnt set the clock frequency, that means
