v4l-utils, dvb-utils, xawtv and alevt (was: v4l-utils: i2c-id.h and alevt)

2010-03-12 Thread Chicken Shack
Am Freitag, den 12.03.2010, 20:20 +0400 schrieb Manu Abraham: > On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 03/11/2010 03:31 PM, Devin Heitmueller wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Douglas Schilling Landgraf > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> On 03/10/2010 02:04

Re: v4l-utils: i2c-id.h and alevt

2010-03-12 Thread Manu Abraham
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 03/11/2010 03:31 PM, Devin Heitmueller wrote: >> >> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Douglas Schilling Landgraf >>  wrote: >>> >>> On 03/10/2010 02:04 AM, hermann pitton wrote: Hi Hans, both, Am Dienstag, den 0

Re: v4l-utils: i2c-id.h and alevt

2010-03-12 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 03/11/2010 03:14 PM, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote: On 03/10/2010 02:04 AM, hermann pitton wrote: Hi Hans, both, Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 08:48 +0100 schrieb Hans Verkuil: It's nice to see this new tree, that should be make it easier to develop utilities! After a quick check I

Re: v4l-utils: i2c-id.h and alevt

2010-03-12 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 03/11/2010 03:31 PM, Devin Heitmueller wrote: On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote: On 03/10/2010 02:04 AM, hermann pitton wrote: Hi Hans, both, Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 08:48 +0100 schrieb Hans Verkuil: It's nice to see this new tree, that should be

Re: v4l-utils: i2c-id.h and alevt

2010-03-12 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 03/12/2010 08:27 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote: On Thursday 11 March 2010 15:31:32 Devin Heitmueller wrote: On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote: On 03/10/2010 02:04 AM, hermann pitton wrote: Hi Hans, both, Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 08:48 +0100 schrieb Hans

Re: v4l-utils: i2c-id.h and alevt

2010-03-12 Thread Devin Heitmueller
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote: > For unmaintained applications the problem is that even those people that > have patches for them have no easy way to get them applied, precisely because > they are unmaintained. > > We as v4l-dvb developers don't have the time to make TV apps,

Re: v4l-utils: i2c-id.h and alevt

2010-03-11 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Thursday 11 March 2010 15:31:32 Devin Heitmueller wrote: > On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Douglas Schilling Landgraf > wrote: > > On 03/10/2010 02:04 AM, hermann pitton wrote: > >> Hi Hans, both, > >> > >> Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 08:48 +0100 schrieb Hans Verkuil: > >>> It's nice to see t

Re: v4l-utils: i2c-id.h and alevt

2010-03-11 Thread Devin Heitmueller
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Douglas Schilling Landgraf wrote: > On 03/10/2010 02:04 AM, hermann pitton wrote: >> Hi Hans, both, >> >> Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 08:48 +0100 schrieb Hans Verkuil: >>> It's nice to see this new tree, that should be make it easier to develop >>> utilities! >>>

Re: v4l-utils: i2c-id.h and alevt

2010-03-11 Thread Douglas Schilling Landgraf
On 03/10/2010 02:04 AM, hermann pitton wrote: > Hi Hans, both, > > Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 08:48 +0100 schrieb Hans Verkuil: >> It's nice to see this new tree, that should be make it easier to develop >> utilities! >> >> After a quick check I noticed that the i2c-id.h header was copied from t

Re: v4l-utils: i2c-id.h and alevt

2010-03-09 Thread hermann pitton
Hi Hans, both, Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 08:48 +0100 schrieb Hans Verkuil: > It's nice to see this new tree, that should be make it easier to develop > utilities! > > After a quick check I noticed that the i2c-id.h header was copied from the > kernel. This is not necessary. The only utility th

v4l-utils: i2c-id.h and alevt

2010-03-08 Thread Hans Verkuil
It's nice to see this new tree, that should be make it easier to develop utilities! After a quick check I noticed that the i2c-id.h header was copied from the kernel. This is not necessary. The only utility that includes this is v4l2-dbg and that one no longer needs it. Hans, can you remove this?