On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:44:08PM -0500, Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote:
> Any reason why this is not added to upstream ? I think this is exactly
> what is needed to support this.
IIRC it does not work reliably with the legacy i2c binding model, so this
has to die first.
Daniel
--
To unsubscrib
age-
>From: Daniel Glöckner [mailto:daniel...@gmx.net]
>Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 3:11 PM
>To: Karicheri, Muralidharan
>Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
>Subject: Re: sub devices sharing same i2c address
>
>On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 01:10:11PM -0500, Karicheri, Muralidharan
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 01:10:11PM -0500, Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote:
> I am having to switch between two sub devices that shares the same i2c
> address. First one is TVP5146 and the other is MT9T031. The second has
> a i2c switch and the evm has a data path switch.
You could try Rodolfo Giomet
Hi,
I am having to switch between two sub devices that shares the same i2c address.
First one is TVP5146 and the other is MT9T031. The second has a i2c switch and
the evm has a data path switch. So in our internal release we could switch
capture inputs between the two by configuring the above t
