Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03/13/2010 02:24 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Please, don't upgrade the version yet just due to keytable, as I'm
>> still working on
>> more keytable patches, to handle the new uevent attributes (to match
>> the IR core patches
>> I posted earlier today).
>
Hi,
On 03/13/2010 02:24 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Please, don't upgrade the version yet just due to keytable, as I'm still
working on
more keytable patches, to handle the new uevent attributes (to match the IR
core patches
I posted earlier today).
Ok,
Note the main reason for the 0.
Hi,
On 03/12/2010 08:29 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 03/12/2010 01:21 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hi Hans,
As we've agreed that the idea is to allow multiple people to commit at
v4l-utils,
today, I've added 3 commits at v4l-utils tree (2 keycode-related a
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Yes. The new objects and the touched files got a different group ownership
>> after git push. I had to manually fix them at the server.
>
> I added a hook that will likely fix it. As I have a few more changes t
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 03/12/2010 01:21 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>> Hi Hans,
>>>
>>> As we've agreed that the idea is to allow multiple people to commit at
>>> v4l-utils,
>>> today, I've added 3 commits at v4l-utils tree (2 keycode-related and 1
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:29:46 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Hans de Goede wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 03/12/2010 01:21 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >> Hi Hans,
> >>
> >> As we've agreed that the idea is to allow multiple people to commit at
> >> v4l-utils,
> >> today, I've added 3 comm
Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03/12/2010 01:21 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>> As we've agreed that the idea is to allow multiple people to commit at
>> v4l-utils,
>> today, I've added 3 commits at v4l-utils tree (2 keycode-related and 1
>> is .gitignore
>> stuff). One of th
Hi,
On 03/12/2010 01:21 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hi Hans,
As we've agreed that the idea is to allow multiple people to commit at
v4l-utils,
today, I've added 3 commits at v4l-utils tree (2 keycode-related and 1 is
.gitignore
stuff). One of the reasons were to test the viability for su
Hi Hans,
As we've agreed that the idea is to allow multiple people to commit at
v4l-utils,
today, I've added 3 commits at v4l-utils tree (2 keycode-related and 1 is
.gitignore
stuff). One of the reasons were to test the viability for such commits.
I've temporarily enabled the same script that w
