Em 03-06-2010 03:27, Jarod Wilson escreveu:
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 1:22 AM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
>> wrote:
>>> Em 31-05-2010 18:45, Andy Walls escreveu:
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 17:58 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>>
> I may
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 1:22 AM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> wrote:
>> Em 31-05-2010 18:45, Andy Walls escreveu:
>>> On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 17:58 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>
I may be wrong (since we didn't write any TX support), but
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
> Em 31-05-2010 18:45, Andy Walls escreveu:
>> On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 17:58 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>
>>> I may be wrong (since we didn't write any TX support), but I think that a
>>> rc_set_tx_parameters() wouldn't be necess
Em 31-05-2010 18:45, Andy Walls escreveu:
> On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 17:58 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> I may be wrong (since we didn't write any TX support), but I think that a
>> rc_set_tx_parameters() wouldn't be necessary, as I don't see why the driver
>> will
>> change the parameters
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 17:58 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em 31-05-2010 16:38, Andy Walls escreveu:
> > On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 16:06 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >> Hi Andy,
> >>
> >> Em 31-05-2010 09:15, Andy Walls escreveu:
> I've now got an ir-lirc-codec bridge passing data
Em 31-05-2010 16:38, Andy Walls escreveu:
> On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 16:06 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Hi Andy,
>>
>> Em 31-05-2010 09:15, Andy Walls escreveu:
I've now got an ir-lirc-codec bridge passing data over to a completely
unmodified lirc_dev, with the data then making its
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 16:06 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> Em 31-05-2010 09:15, Andy Walls escreveu:
> >> I've now got an ir-lirc-codec bridge passing data over to a completely
> >> unmodified lirc_dev, with the data then making its way out to the
> >> lircd userspace where its
Hi Andy,
Em 31-05-2010 09:15, Andy Walls escreveu:
>> I've now got an ir-lirc-codec bridge passing data over to a completely
>> unmodified lirc_dev, with the data then making its way out to the
>> lircd userspace where its even getting properly decoded. I don't have
>> the transmit side of things
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 02:20 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> > wrote:
> >> Em 29-05-2010 23:24, Jarod Wilson escreveu:
> >>> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Andy Walls
> >>> wrote:
>
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> wrote:
>> Em 29-05-2010 23:24, Jarod Wilson escreveu:
>>> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Andy Walls wrote:
> ...
> We do have the
> option to disable all but the relevant p
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
> Em 29-05-2010 23:24, Jarod Wilson escreveu:
>> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Andy Walls wrote:
...
We do have the
option to disable all but the relevant protocol handler on a
per-device basis though, if that's a p
Em 29-05-2010 23:24, Jarod Wilson escreveu:
> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Andy Walls wrote:
>> On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 12:58 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Andy Walls wrote:
On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 00:47 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> So I'm inching closer
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Andy Walls wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 12:58 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Andy Walls wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 00:47 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>> >> So I'm inching closer to a viable mceusb driver submission -- both a
On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 12:58 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Andy Walls wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 00:47 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> >> So I'm inching closer to a viable mceusb driver submission -- both a
> >> first-gen and a third-gen transceiver are now workin
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Andy Walls wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 00:47 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
>> So I'm inching closer to a viable mceusb driver submission -- both a
>> first-gen and a third-gen transceiver are now working perfectly with
>> multiple different mce remotes. However, th
On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 00:47 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> So I'm inching closer to a viable mceusb driver submission -- both a
> first-gen and a third-gen transceiver are now working perfectly with
> multiple different mce remotes. However, that's only when I make sure
> the mceusb driver is loaded
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 12:47 AM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> So I'm inching closer to a viable mceusb driver submission -- both a
> first-gen and a third-gen transceiver are now working perfectly with
> multiple different mce remotes. However, that's only when I make sure
> the mceusb driver is loaded
So I'm inching closer to a viable mceusb driver submission -- both a
first-gen and a third-gen transceiver are now working perfectly with
multiple different mce remotes. However, that's only when I make sure
the mceusb driver is loaded w/only the rc6 decoder loaded. When
ir-core comes up, it reques
18 matches
Mail list logo
