Re: femon signal strength

2011-11-07 Thread Andreas Oberritter
On 07.11.2011 16:13, Luca Olivetti wrote: > Al 07/11/2011 11:47, En/na Andreas Oberritter ha escrit: >> I didn't receive Devin's mail, so I'm replying to this one instead, see >> below: > > [...] >> Quoting myself from three years ago, I propose to add an interface to >> read SNR in units of db/10

Re: femon signal strength

2011-11-07 Thread Luca Olivetti
Al 07/11/2011 11:47, En/na Andreas Oberritter ha escrit: I didn't receive Devin's mail, so I'm replying to this one instead, see below: [...] Quoting myself from three years ago, I propose to add an interface to read SNR in units of db/100: A previous version of the dvb api specified the uni

Re: femon signal strength

2011-11-07 Thread Andreas Oberritter
I didn't receive Devin's mail, so I'm replying to this one instead, see below: On 06.11.2011 20:59, Steffen Barszus wrote: > On Sun, 6 Nov 2011 10:01:49 -0500 > Devin Heitmueller wrote: > >> On Sunday, November 6, 2011, Steffen Barszus >> wrote: >>> >>> Any uniform >>> scale is better, then wha

Re: femon signal strength

2011-11-06 Thread Steffen Barszus
On Sun, 6 Nov 2011 10:01:49 -0500 Devin Heitmueller wrote: > On Sunday, November 6, 2011, Steffen Barszus > wrote: > > On Sat, 5 Nov 2011 15:38:50 -0400 > > Devin Heitmueller wrote: > > > >> On Saturday, November 5, 2011, Steffen Barszus > >> wrote: > >> > On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:58:32 -0400 >

Re: femon signal strength

2011-11-06 Thread Steffen Barszus
On Sat, 5 Nov 2011 15:38:50 -0400 Devin Heitmueller wrote: > On Saturday, November 5, 2011, Steffen Barszus > wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:58:32 -0400 > > James wrote: > >> How about adding switches to femon, it won't be automatic? > >> > >> I'm going to make femon work for my card, anyway

Re: femon signal strength

2011-11-05 Thread Steffen Barszus
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:58:32 -0400 James wrote: > On 10/26/11 15:49, Devin Heitmueller wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 3:45 PM, James wrote: > >> How many different formats are there (do I have to go through the > >> archive)? Would it be feasable to change femon to handle different > >> form

Re: femon signal strength

2011-10-26 Thread James
On 10/26/11 15:49, Devin Heitmueller wrote: On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 3:45 PM, James wrote: How many different formats are there (do I have to go through the archive)? Would it be feasable to change femon to handle different formats? There are three or four common formats, and there is no real w

Re: femon signal strength

2011-10-26 Thread Devin Heitmueller
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 3:45 PM, James wrote: > How many different formats are there (do I have to go through the archive)? > Would it be feasable to change femon to handle different formats? There are three or four common formats, and there is no real way for an application to know which format

Re: femon signal strength

2011-10-26 Thread James
On 10/26/11 04:15, Devin Heitmueller wrote: On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:36 AM, James wrote: My signal strength is always above 0 but when I use -H, it is 0%. Does that mean my signal strength is<0%? Maybe femon should report 0.x%. $ femon FE: Samsung S5H1409 QAM/8VSB Frontend (ATSC) status SCVY

Re: femon signal strength

2011-10-26 Thread Devin Heitmueller
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:36 AM, James wrote: > My signal strength is always above 0 but when I use -H, it is 0%. > Does that mean my signal strength is <0%? > Maybe femon should report 0.x%. > > $ femon > FE: Samsung S5H1409 QAM/8VSB Frontend (ATSC) > status SCVYL | signal 00b9 | snr 00b9 | ber

femon signal strength

2011-10-25 Thread James
My signal strength is always above 0 but when I use -H, it is 0%. Does that mean my signal strength is <0%? Maybe femon should report 0.x%. $ femon FE: Samsung S5H1409 QAM/8VSB Frontend (ATSC) status SCVYL | signal 00b9 | snr 00b9 | ber | unc | FE_HAS_LOCK $ femon -H FE: Sams