On Wednesday 16 September 2009 02:15:30 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:16:05 +0200
> Hans Verkuil escreveu:
>
> > On Tuesday 15 September 2009 21:20:02 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > Something that always bothered me is that the documentation inside the
> > > kernel
>
Em Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:16:05 +0200
Hans Verkuil escreveu:
> On Tuesday 15 September 2009 21:20:02 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Something that always bothered me is that the documentation inside the
> > kernel
> > for V4L/DVB were never properly updated, since people that write drivers in
> >
Em Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:06:34 -0700
Randy Dunlap escreveu:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:20:02 -0300 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>
> > Something that always bothered me is that the documentation inside the
> > kernel
> > for V4L/DVB were never properly updated, since people that write drivers in
> >
On Tuesday 15 September 2009 21:20:02 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Something that always bothered me is that the documentation inside the kernel
> for V4L/DVB were never properly updated, since people that write drivers in
> general don't bother to keep the docs updated there. After some time, we
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:20:02 -0300 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Something that always bothered me is that the documentation inside the kernel
> for V4L/DVB were never properly updated, since people that write drivers in
> general don't bother to keep the docs updated there. After some time, we'v
Something that always bothered me is that the documentation inside the kernel
for V4L/DVB were never properly updated, since people that write drivers in
general don't bother to keep the docs updated there. After some time, we've
removed V4L1 API from kernel (in text format, as far as I can remembe
