On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 10:51 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 22:39 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
Andy,
You are right. Your camera is emitting JPEG while streaming. I just
succeeded in creat
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 10:51 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
>
> On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 22:39 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
> >> Andy,
> >>
> >> You are right. Your camera is emitting JPEG while streaming. I just
> >> succeeded in creating an image which
Therefore with a little bit of further tweaking it will presumably come
out exactly so. Namely, I have to remember where to stick the two
dimensions into the header.
Today's progress, so far:
1. I managed to look up where the width and height go, and indeed the
image comes out nicely when
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 22:39 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
Andy,
You are right. Your camera is emitting JPEG while streaming. I just
succeeded in creating an image which resembles your test picture by
extracting the frame data for one frame, tacking on
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 22:39 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
> Andy,
>
> You are right. Your camera is emitting JPEG while streaming. I just
> succeeded in creating an image which resembles your test picture by
> extracting the frame data for one frame, tacking on a header, and running
> hex2bin
Andy,
You are right. Your camera is emitting JPEG while streaming. I just
succeeded in creating an image which resembles your test picture by
extracting the frame data for one frame, tacking on a header, and running
hex2bin on the combined file. I did not get the thing quite right, because
y
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 10:42 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
>
> On Sun, 21 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
> > The more I dig into this, the more I think (hope or wish?) the stuff in
> > the usb snoop logs looks MJPEG.
> >
> > I started looking at an AVI file that I recorded with the camera. It
> > l
I mentioned in my last message a couple of things to try in order to make
further progress. One of those was
2. Take some of the snoop log output and convert it by hand to a binary
file, so that it can actually be looked at with hexdump to see if similar
clues are present. I have a few tools t
On Sun, 21 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 20:04 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
Sure looks that way. I took a closer look at the lines starting with ff ff
ff ff strings, and I found a couple more things. Here are several lines
from an extract from that snoop, consisting
On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 20:04 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
>
> >>> Sure looks that way. I took a closer look at the lines starting with ff ff
> >>> ff ff strings, and I found a couple more things. Here are several lines
> >>> from an extract from that snoop, consisting of what appear to be
> >>>
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 15:23 -0400, Andy Walls wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 23:38 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
Now it is using the other pair of endpoints, 0x03 and 0x84.
H. I wonder if we can use them anyway, without being connected in
"webca
On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 15:23 -0400, Andy Walls wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 23:38 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
>
> > >>
> > >> Now it is using the other pair of endpoints, 0x03 and 0x84.
> > >
> > > H. I wonder if we can use them anyway, without being connected in
> > > "webcam" mode.
> >
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 23:38 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
Now it is using the other pair of endpoints, 0x03 and 0x84.
H. I wonder if we can use them anyway, without being connected in
"webcam" mode.
Nope. That was the previously mentioned bug
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 23:38 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
> >>
> >> Now it is using the other pair of endpoints, 0x03 and 0x84.
> >
> > H. I wonder if we can use them anyway, without being connected in
> > "webcam" mode.
>
> Nope. That was the previously mentioned bug in the Linux mass stor
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 19:26 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 12:47 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 21:43 -0500, Theodore Kilgore
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 19:26 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
>
> On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 12:47 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 21:43 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
>
> >>
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 12:47 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 21:43 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
Interesting. To answer your question, I have no
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 12:47 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 21:43 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
Interesting. To answer your question, I have no
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 12:47 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
>
> On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 21:43 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> Interesting. To answer your question, I have no idea
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 21:43 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
Interesting. To answer your question, I have no idea off the top of my
head. I do have what seems to be a similar camera. It is
Bus 005 Device 006:
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 21:43 -0500, Theodore Kilgore wrote:
>
> On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
> >
> >
> >
>
> Interesting. To answer your question, I have no idea off the top of my
> head. I do have what seems to be a similar camera. It is
>
> Bus 005 Device 006: ID 0979:0371 Jeilin Tec
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Andy Walls wrote:
My daughter just got one of these toy digital video recorder & webcam
unit.
It normally shows up as a mass storage drive.
If I hold down the shutter button while connecting the USB cable, the
camera LCD show a "webcam mode" icon and it shows up as a dif
My daughter just got one of these toy digital video recorder & webcam
unit.
It normally shows up as a mass storage drive.
If I hold down the shutter button while connecting the USB cable, the
camera LCD show a "webcam mode" icon and it shows up as a different USB
device.
Any chance of this worki
23 matches
Mail list logo
